Skip to content
Renown Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Renown Health Foundation

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$59MEducation$525kCommunity Improvement$250kHuman Services$24k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $16,808,361, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,365,208 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $556,847 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $271k
  • $250k+4 grants · $17M
$1,564,361
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Renown Regional Medical Center$12,547,861
Hometown Health Management Company$1,827,502
Renown South Meadows Medical Center$1,564,361
Renown Health$597,185
Renown Medical School Associates North Inc$174,213
Renown Transitional Care Services$97,239
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Children's Cabinet: $15k → 10%Children's Cabinet: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60M · 8 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$60M
$310k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+217%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    Renown Regional Medical Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37M · revenue +83%
  • RS
    Renown South Meadows Medical Center
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +62%
  • RH
    Renown Health
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • TM
    TRUCKEE MEADOWS HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -98% · 50% of their budget
  • NP
    NEVADA PHYSICIAN WELLNESS COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +239%
  • RS
    Renown Skilled Nursing
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Renown Health Foundation

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

—
2
Hometown Health Plan Inc

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

—
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Washoe Barton Medical Clinic

Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.

Health
5
LeConte Medical Center

LeConte Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Roane County Medical Center

Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
Boulder City Hospital Inc

Boulder City Hospital seeks to continually improve the quality of the care and service to our patients, guests, and physicians. We promote effective and efficient utilization of available resources to ensure long-term financial viability.…

Health
8
Barton Healthcare System

Barton Health delivers safe, high quality care and engages the community in the improvement of health and wellness. Barton Health is the community health leader known for compassion and chosen for quality.

Health
9
Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc

Our vision at Monument Health Rapid City Hospital is to be one team, to listen, to be inclusive, and to show we care. Monument Health Rapid City Hospital is dedicated to improving the health of individuals and our communities.

Health
10
Reedley Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Reedley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—
11
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
12
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renown Regional Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Nevada Physician Wellness Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renown Regional Medical Center: $37,221,689 · HealthRenown Regional Medical CenterRenown South Meadows Medical Center: $5,270,621 · HealthRenown South Meadows Medical CenterRenown Health: $2,590,175 · HealthRenown Health+4 more: $609,044 · HealthHometown Health Management Company: $13,359,258 · OtherHometown Health Managemen…+2 more: $260,000 · OtherUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $525,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $23,747 · Human Services
Health$45,691,529Other$13,619,258Education$525,000Human Services$23,747

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenown Regional Medical Center: $37,221,689 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetRenown South Meadows Medical Center: $5,270,621 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetRenown Health: $2,590,175 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $525,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRenown Medical School Associates North Inc: $367,158 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: $250,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetRenown Transitional Care Services: $191,886 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $23,747 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRenown Skilled Nursing: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Renown Health
Renown HealthNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renown Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renown Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renown Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Renown Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home