· Public charity
Renown Health Foundation
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $16,808,361 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,365,208 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $556,847 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k2 grants · $271k
- $250k+4 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Renown Regional Medical Center | $12,547,861 |
| Hometown Health Management Company | $1,827,502 |
| Renown South Meadows Medical Center | $1,564,361 |
| Renown Health | $597,185 |
| Renown Medical School Associates North Inc | $174,213 |
| Renown Transitional Care Services | $97,239 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRRenown Regional Medical Center8× · 2017–2024 · $37M · revenue +83%
- RSRenown South Meadows Medical Center7× · 2017–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +62%
- RHRenown Health8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +58%
Funded once
- TMTRUCKEE MEADOWS HEALTHY COMMUNITIESone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -98% · 50% of their budget
- NPNEVADA PHYSICIAN WELLNESS COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +217%
- RSRenown Skilled Nursingone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.
LeConte Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Boulder City Hospital seeks to continually improve the quality of the care and service to our patients, guests, and physicians. We promote effective and efficient utilization of available resources to ensure long-term financial viability.…
Barton Health delivers safe, high quality care and engages the community in the improvement of health and wellness. Barton Health is the community health leader known for compassion and chosen for quality.
Our vision at Monument Health Rapid City Hospital is to be one team, to listen, to be inclusive, and to show we care. Monument Health Rapid City Hospital is dedicated to improving the health of individuals and our communities.
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renown Regional Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Nevada Physician Wellness Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Renown Regional Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Renown South Meadows Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Renown Health ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds Renown Medical School Associates North Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS HEALTHY COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Renown Transitional Care Services ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PHYSICIAN WELLNESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
- Who funds Renown Skilled Nursing ↗
- Who funds HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Renown Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Renown Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.