Skip to content

· Private foundation

Renfro Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$627kEducation$490kHuman Services$197kAnimals$133kHealth$72kReligion$45kPhilanthropy$34kFood & Nutrition$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN OKLAHOMA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$63,500
VARIOUS 2500$18,050
HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OK$16,913
PONCA CITY MAIN STREET$15,500
UNIVERSITY CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
ATTUCKS CUMMUNITY ALLIANCE$12,250
HARMONY HOUSE$10,000
CORYELL CUPBOARD$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$6,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PONCA CITY ARTS & HUMANITIES$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%MARLAND'S CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 14%MARLAND'S CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 14%MARLAND'S CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 14%CORYELL CUPBOARD: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 30 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +104% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104%
0%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    Northern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +12%
  • ME
    Marland Estate Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +224%
  • PC
    PONCA CITY MAINSTREET INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • SB
    Standing Bear Native American Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0% · 40% of their budget
  • PT
    PONCAN THEATER
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • PC
    PONCA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Preservation Oklahoma Inc

To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.

—
2
Claremore Museum of History Inc

To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma

Arts & Culture
3
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
4
Eastern Oklahoma State College Development Foundation Inc

The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…

Education
5
The Northeastern State University Foundation Inc

The NSU Foundation was created exclusively to benefit Northeastern State University for charitable, benevolent, educational, scientific and literary purposes.

Education
6
Plains Indians and Pioneers Historical Foundation

Preserve the historical heritage of people living in the 50 mile radius of woodward, oklahoma for the publics benefit.

Arts & Culture
7
Midwest Covenant Home Inc

Nursing home care and assisted living for the elderly.

Health
8
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
9
Oklahoma Primate Sanctuary Inc

To provide monkeys retired from research and rescued from the pet trade and other abusive situations with permanent refuge and companionship in safe and healthy habitats.

Animals
10
Bartlesville Area Habitat for Humanity

Low cost housing for needy families.

Housing & Shelter
11
Sigma Nu Corporation of Oklahoma

To provide student housing for University of Oklahoma members of Sigma Nu Fraternity.

Education
12
Oklahoma Mobility Institute

None

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Hall of Fame; the most unlike its peers is Coryell Cupboard Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STANDING BEAR NATIVE AMERICAN FOUND: $173,850 · OtherSTANDING BEAR NATIVE AMERICAN FOUNDOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF PONCA CITY: $105,500 · OtherOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF PONCA CITYPONCAN THEATRE: $105,000 · OtherPONCAN THEATREVALLEY HOPE CENTER: $86,000 · OtherVALLEY HOPE CENTERVARIOUS 1000: $73,514 · OtherVARIOUS 1000VARIOUS 2500: $72,963 · OtherVARIOUS 2500HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OK: $71,663 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKHARMONY HOUSE: $56,016 · OtherUNIVERSITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $54,100 · OtherATTUCKS CUMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $39,500 · OtherCITY ARTS: $37,500 · Other+21 more: $231,571 · Other+21 moreStanding Bear Native American Foundation Inc: $100,200 · Arts & CultureStanding Bear Na…Marland Estate Foundation: $89,300 · Arts & CultureMarland Estate F…OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $39,900 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA HALL OF…PONCA CITY MAINSTREET INC: $28,000 · Arts & CulturePONCA CITY MAINS…Northern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc: $220,400 · EducationNorthern Oklah…NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $125,050 · AnimalsCORYELL CUPBOARD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $8,400 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $16,000 · Food & NutritionPIONEER TECHNOLOGY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,107,177Arts & Culture$257,400Education$220,400Animals$125,050Human Services$18,400Food & Nutrition$16,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc: $220,400 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $125,050 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetStanding Bear Native American Foundation Inc: $100,200 over 1y, 40% of budgetMarland Estate Foundation: $89,300 over 8y, 10% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $39,900 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPONCA CITY MAINSTREET INC: $28,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPIONEER TECHNOLOGY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCORYELL CUPBOARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $8,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Standing Bear Native American Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marland Estate Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds PONCA CITY MAINSTREET INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER TECHNOLOGY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORYELL CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Evans Family FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Evans Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renfro Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renfro Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Renfro Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Renfro Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Renfro Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph