Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Renee Malca Cadour Corn Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$311kHuman Services$286kInternational$110kPublic Benefit$91kFood & Nutrition$90kHousing & Shelter$30kScience & Tech$28kCivil Rights$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $137k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
$3,850
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of IDFNorth TX Chapter$33,000
Hadassah$17,000
American Friends of Magen David Adom$12,000
Disabled American Veterans Charitable Service Trust$11,500
Veterans of Foreign Wars$7,500
Salvation Army$7,500
American Cancer Society$7,400
YWCA$6,500
Mazon$6,300
Individual grant recipient$6,000
North Texas Food Bank$6,000
Vogel Alcove Child Care Center for the Homeless$5,800
Lustgarten Foundation$5,500
American Friends of SanzLaniado Hospital$5,400
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science$5,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lustgarten Foundation: $6k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $3k → 16%Jesus House: $2k → 16%Lustgarten Foundation: $5k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $2k → 16%Jesus House: $1k → 16%Lustgarten Foundation: $5k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $2k → 16%Jesus House: $1k → 16%Lustgarten Foundation: $5k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $2k → 16%Jesus House: $1k → 16%Lustgarten Foundation: $5k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $2k → 16%Jesus House: $1k → 16%Lustgarten Foundation: $5k → 6%Guide Dogs of TexasSouthwest Guide Dog Foundation: $2k → 16%Jesus House: $1k → 16%The Family Place: $4k → 14%The Family Place: $3k → 14%The Family Place: $3k → 14%The Family Place: $3k → 14%The Family Place: $3k → 14%The Family Place: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 40 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
0

Total granted

$1.0M
$0

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPublic BenefitPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust
    6× · 2020–2025 · $57k · revenue +86%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +198%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +45%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

    Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

    Community Improvement
    2
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

    Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

    3
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

    The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

    Health
    4
    American Jewish Committee

    AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

    Civil Rights
    5
    Zichron Avrohom Yosef
    Philanthropy
    6
    New York Genome Center Inc

    Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

    Health
    7
    New York University

    Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

    Education
    8
    National Jewish Health

    National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

    Health
    9
    The Jerusalem Connection
    10
    American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

    The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

    International
    11
    Weizmann Institute of Science

    The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

    Science & Tech
    12
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Committee for Shaare Zedek Hospital in Jerusalem Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dillon International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

    THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
    THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

    The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

    Closures · last 5 years

    The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

    orgs you fund
    0.0%0/23
    the rest of the field
    13%
    240,396/1,819,542

    Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

    04the grantee network

    22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    22/22
    Grantees still filing
    17/22
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Friends of IDFNorth TX Chapter — $181,190 · OtherFriends of IDFNorth TX ChapterHadassah — $93,025 · OtherHadassahSALVATION ARMY — $34,750 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVeterans of Foreign Wars — $34,000 · OtherVeterans of Foreign WarsMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $33,000 · OtherYWCA — $29,820 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $29,200 · OtherAmerican Friends of SanzLaniado Hospital — $27,880 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,835 · OtherWorld Jewish Congress — $22,045 · Other+12 more — $120,710 · Other+12 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $55,930 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $27,850 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITT…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $21,145 · InternationalThe American Jew…AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $19,950 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITT…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $17,841 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL …THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC — $12,295 · InternationalTHE GOOD PEOPLE …MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $29,180 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGAR…VOGEL ALCOVE — $26,090 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVEThe Family Place — $20,060 · Human ServicesThe Family P…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,700 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…Guide Dogs of Texas Inc — $13,900 · Human ServicesGuide Dogs o…Jesus House Inc — $7,880 · Human ServicesJesus House …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $39,000 · HealthPROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $15,470 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $7,480 · HealthAMERICAN SEXUAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $4,095 · HealthDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust — $56,540 · Public BenefitBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $19,810 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION — $11,960 · Youth Development
    Other$633,455International$155,011Human Services$112,810Health$66,045Public Benefit$56,540Philanthropy$19,810Youth Development$11,960

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust — $56,540 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $55,930 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $39,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $29,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $29,180 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $27,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $26,090 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $21,145 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place — $20,060 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $19,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $19,810 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $17,841 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $15,470 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc — $13,900 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC — $12,295 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION — $11,960 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJesus House Inc — $7,880 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $7,480 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SEXUAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $4,095 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDillon International Inc — $2,850 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust
    • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE
    • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    • Who funds The Family Place
    • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
    • Who funds BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    • Who funds Guide Dogs of Texas Inc
    • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC
    • Who funds AMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION
    • Who funds Jesus House Inc
    • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
    • Who funds AMERICAN SEXUAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Renee Malca Cadour Corn Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      2get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph