Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rena Fee Welch Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$109k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$648
Median grant
3
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL COLLEGE$1,463
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,401
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,339
SIMPSON COLLEGE$1,315
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$857
CORNELL COLLEGE$759
IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$737
TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY$730
WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY$648
CENTRAL COLLEGE$636
WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY$615
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$613
ELMHURST UNIVERSITY$587
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$549
BLACK HAWK EAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SIMPSON COLLEGE: $1k → 6%CENTRAL COLLEGE: $1k → 8%CORNELL COLLEGE: $759 → 9%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $100 → 10%WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $648 → 10%IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $737 → 13%INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 16%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $100 → 17%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $730 → 28%ELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $587 → 7%BLACK HAWK EAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $100 → 9%CENTRAL COLLEGE: $636 → 8%WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $615 → 10%INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $549 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 16 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
26

Total granted

$77k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+83%

Still filing today

38%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $830 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +13%
  • IH
    INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +450%
  • EU
    ELMHURST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +83%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • NH
    NICHOLAS HASELHUHN CO UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union College

Offer a college experience including education, housing, & associated programs in lincoln, ne.

Education
2
Luther College

On a campus of more than 800 acres along the banks of the upper iowa river in decorah, iowa, luther is a true residential campus, with 96 percent of students living on campus and nearly 95 percent of faculty choosing to live within five…

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Saint mary's university of minnesota is a private catholic institution that serves about 3,900 students annually. the university offers a comprehensive, personalized education guided by its lasallian catholic heritage. with a wide array of…

Education
4
Upper Iowa University

Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

Education
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher learning in the liberal arts.

Education
8
Centre College

Centre college is an educational community dedicated to study in the liberal arts as a means to develop the intellectual, personal, and moral potential of its students.

Education
9
Dordt University

Dordt university was founded in 1955 and provides christ-centered education for students, alumni, and the broader community.

Education
10
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university educating at post-secondary & graduate level

Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

An academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within a christian environment.

Education
12
Augustana University Association

A four-year liberal arts university affiliated with the evangelical lutheran church.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Ambrose University and the most unlike its peers is North Iowa Area Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY — $19,342 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $5,651 · OtherINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGEELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $5,626 · OtherELMHURST UNIVERSITYDAKOTA PINEGAR CO UNIVERSITY OF — $5,412 · OtherDAKOTA PINEGAR CO UNIVERSITY OFUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA — $3,910 · OtherNICHOLAS HASELHUHN CO UNIVERSITY — $3,468 · OtherALLIE UTTERBACK CO WILLIAM PENN — $3,366 · OtherRILEY KELDERMAN CO ST AMBROSE — $2,939 · OtherALEXIS CROZIER CO SIMPSON COLLEGE — $2,734 · Other+30 more — $24,983 · Other+30 moreWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $15,893 · EducationWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITYST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY — $6,868 · EducationST AMBROSE UNIVERSITYSimpson College — $4,619 · EducationSimpson CollegeCENTRAL COLLEGE — $3,579 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGE+1 more — $859 · Education
Other$77,431Education$31,818

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $15,893 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY — $6,868 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $5,651 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $5,626 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College — $4,619 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE — $3,579 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE — $859 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds ELMHURST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Simpson College
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE
  • Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Moore Scholarship TrustWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moore Scholarship Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rena Fee Welch Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph