Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Reid Lillian Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232026.

Health$192kAnimals$128kFood & Nutrition$128kEducation$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$64kPublic Benefit$64k
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$14,580
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE$14,580
ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC$14,580
BENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR$14,580
THE DORSET EQUINE RESCUE$14,580
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT$14,580
BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY$14,580
BENNINGTON COUNTY MEALS PROGRAM$14,580
VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST$14,580
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH SYS$14,580
MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC$14,580
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $17k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY: $17k → 11%VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST: $17k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $16k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY: $16k → 11%VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST: $16k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $16k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY: $16k → 11%VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST: $16k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $15k → 10%BENNINGTON COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY: $15k → 11%VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST: $15k → 12%MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $17k → 11%MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $16k → 11%MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $16k → 11%MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $15k → 11%THE DORSET EQUINE RESCUE: $17k → 11%THE DORSET EQUINE RESCUE: $16k → 11%THE DORSET EQUINE RESCUE: $16k → 11%THE DORSET EQUINE RESCUE: $15k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS OF: $17k → 11%BENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR: $17k → 11%ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC: $17k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE: $17k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE: $16k → 11%BENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR: $16k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS OF: $16k → 11%ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC: $16k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS OF: $16k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE: $16k → 11%ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC: $16k → 11%BENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR: $16k → 11%ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC: $15k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE: $15k → 11%BENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR: $15k → 11%BENNINGTON COUNTY MEALS PROGRAM: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$625k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$625k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+88%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
    4× · 2023–2026 · $64k · revenue +56%
  • BC
    Bennington County Humane Society Inc
    4× · 2023–2026 · $64k · revenue +127%
  • MR
    MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD
    4× · 2023–2026 · $64k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • BC
    Bennington County Meals Programgraduated
    one grant, 2026 · $15k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INC — $63,960 · OtherARLINGTON FOOD SHELF INCUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT — $63,960 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONTBENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FOR — $63,960 · OtherBENNINGTON COUNTY COALITION FORVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc — $63,960 · OtherVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region IncMEALS ON WHEELS OF — $49,380 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OFDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $63,960 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock HealthMANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD — $63,960 · HealthMANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NO…SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION — $63,960 · HealthSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE C…The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc — $63,960 · AnimalsThe Dorset Equine Resc…Bennington County Humane Society Inc — $63,960 · AnimalsBennington County Huma…Bennington County Meals Program — $14,580 · Food & Nutrition
Other$305,220Health$191,880Animals$127,920Food & Nutrition$14,580

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $63,960 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Dorset Equine Rescue Inc — $63,960 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBennington County Humane Society Inc — $63,960 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetMANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD — $63,960 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc — $63,960 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION — $63,960 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
  • Who funds The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc
  • Who funds Bennington County Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD
  • Who funds VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION
  • Who funds Bennington County Meals Program

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Orvis Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Reid Lillian Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph