Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$49kFood & Nutrition$11kYouth Development$5kPhilanthropy$2kCommunity Improvement$2kArts & Culture$50Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$10,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AM SHALOM$10,600
EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $50 → 14%THE CITY MISSION: $2k → 9%SEE ATTACHED: $27k → 7%AM SHALOM: $11k → 14%NORTHSHORE CONGREGATION: $3k → 14%FEMALE STRONG: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $95 → 14%EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIO: $13k → 14%EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATI: $10k → 14%EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIO: $10k → 14%EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIO: $5k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $2k → 14%EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATI: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIO: $28,000 · OtherEZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIOAM SHALOM: $10,600 · OtherAM SHALOMEZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATI: $10,050 · OtherEZRA-HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP JEWISH CONGREGATIIndividual grant recipient: $2,675 · OtherTHE CITY MISSION: $1,800 · Other+2 more: $595 · OtherFeeding America: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaFEMALE STRONG: $5,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,800 · PhilanthropyThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $50 · Arts & Culture
Other$53,720Food & Nutrition$10,000Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$1,800Arts & Culture$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds FEMALE STRONG ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Reich Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Reich Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $27k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph