· Public charity
Regenstrief Institute Inc
To improve health through research that enhances the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care, by functioning as a healthcare laboratory and community of scholars.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2018
- $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
- $250k+1 grant · $793k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY | $793,449 |
| PURDUE UNIVERSITY | $42,441 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Grants abroad, by region: $57k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Medical Informatics
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2018.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2018, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 2 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Play a game based on Regenstrief Institute’s filings →