Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Redwine Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Animals$103kFood & Nutrition$100kPublic Benefit$32kYouth Development$29kArts & Culture$25kScience & Tech$19kEducation$17kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,500
ARBOR MONTESSORI SCHOOL$6,250
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$6,250
TROUT UNLIMITED INC$6,250
COUNTERPANE MONTESSORI SCHOOL$6,250
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE$4,500
DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS$4,000
FRIENDS OF THE HISTORIC FAYETTEVILE$3,500
COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC FOR FORSYTH$3,000
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$3,000
SOLUTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$3,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA COUNCIL$2,000
LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT$2,000
THE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOLUTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 16 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
29

Total granted

$336k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+8%

Still filing today

31%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentScience & TechYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +89%
  • DM
    DECATUR MAKERS INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $19k · revenue +59%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA -- ALOHA COUNCIL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Animal Project Inc

Georgia Animal Projects mission is to reduce animal suffering and shelter by euthanasia by confronting companion-animal overpopulation through effective education programs and by supporting high quality, low-cost spay and neuter programs…

2
Lucky Dog Animal Rescue

Lucky dog animal rescue is a volunteer-powered nonprofit dedicated to rescuing homeless, neglected, and abandoned animals from certain euthanasia and finding them loving forever homes. we educate the community and all pet owners on…

Animals
3
Furkids Inc

Animal rescue organization rescue homeless animals, provide them with the best medical care and nurturing environment while working to find them a forever home.

Animals
4
Adopt a Golden Atlanta Inc

Adopt a golden atlanta, inc. is a volunteer, nonprofit organization dedicated to finding warm, loving permanent homes for golden retrievers.

Animals
5
One Love Animal Rescue Inc

We help abandoned, neglected, abused, and unwanted pets in the savannah, ga area by partnering with shelters, rescue groups, and the community to facilitate adoption of these animals into permanent and loving homes.

Public Benefit
6
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
7
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
8
Charleston Animal Society

Since its founding, our mission has always stayed the same: the prevention of cruelty to animals. in 1874, charleston animal society became the first animal organization in south carolina and one of the first in the nation and has never…

Animals
9
Good Mews Animal Foundation Inc

Good mews offers an alternative to traditional animal shelters in the metro-atlanta area by providing a limited admission haven for homeless, abused, or abandoned cats until placing them in permanent, loving homes. good mews promotes…

Animals
10
Atlanta Animal Rescue Friends Inc

The mission of Atlanta Animal Rescue Friends is to end pet overpopulation. We rescue companion animals and provide veterinary care, subsidize spay/neuter surgeries, and provide humane education to the community.

Animals
11
Fixing the Boro Inc

To provide low-cost sterilization to Bulloch and surrounding counties residents pets. Fixing the Boro offers a humane and sustainable solution to the overpopulation of dogs, cats in Bulloch and surrounding counties.

Animals
12
Atlanta Boxer Rescue Inc

Atlanta boxer rescue strives to rescue, medically rehabilitate, and re-home unwanted and abondoned boxers within the greater atlanta area as well as providing education to pet owners.we work to inform people about the realities of pet…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trees Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Decatur Makers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

2nd Harvest Food Bank — $80,000 · Other2nd Harvest Food BankIndividual grant recipient — $35,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF FAYETTEVILLE — $32,500 · OtherCITY OF FAYETTEVILLEIndividual grant recipient — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF THE HISTORIC FAYETTEVILE — $13,500 · Other+35 more — $142,000 · Other+35 moreRESCUECATS INC — $59,000 · AnimalsRESCUECATS INCLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $23,000 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT…WINGING CAT RESCUE INC — $13,000 · AnimalsWINGING CAT RESCUE INCSECOND CHANCE GREYHOUNDS INC — $8,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE GREYHOUND…DECATUR MAKERS INC — $18,500 · Science & TechSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $6,250 · EnvironmentTREES ATLANTA INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentARBOR MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $6,250 · EducationTHE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT INC — $4,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HISTORIC WOOLSEY — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$344,500Animals$103,000Science & Tech$18,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Environment$8,750Education$6,250Arts & Culture$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRESCUECATS INC — $59,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR MAKERS INC — $18,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWINGING CAT RESCUE INC — $13,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE GREYHOUNDS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetARBOR MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREES ATLANTA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RESCUECATS INC
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
  • Who funds DECATUR MAKERS INC
  • Who funds WINGING CAT RESCUE INC
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE GREYHOUNDS INC
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED aka The Georgia Council of Trout Unlimited Inc
  • Who funds ARBOR MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA -- ALOHA COUNCIL
  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council
  • Who funds THE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE
  • Who funds THE ADAPTABLES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Redwine Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Redwine Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Redwine Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph