Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray Huser Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$23kHuman Services$9kReligion$9kHealth$8kYouth Development$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$515Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$350
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,600
Westfield Education Foundation$700
Godsplaining$650
Vincent Village Inc$375
Teacher's Treasures Inc$350
Boys and Girls Club of Noblesville$350
Diocese of Ft Wayne South bend$350
Catholic Charities Ft Wayne South Bend$325
St Pius X Catholic Church$200
Catholic Charities of Indianapolis$200
Sisters of Providence$200
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SACRED HEART FOOD PANTRY: $400 → 10%DOMINICAN FATHERS PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH: $1k → 17%Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Church: $375 → 5%MSD OF MARTINSVILLE SCHOLARSHIPS: $4k → 9%VINCENT VILLAGE: $400 → 12%SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH: $400 → 18%SISTERS OF THE PROVIDENCE: $400 → 19%HOOSIER BURN CAMP: $800 → 19%The Dominican Foundation of Dominican Friars: $750 → 17%NOBLESVILLE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $800 → 5%MSD Martinsville: $4k → 9%Vincent Village Inc: $375 → 12%INDIANA DENTAL ASSN FDN: $1k → 16%HOOSIER BURN CAMP: $700 → 19%DOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION: $700 → 17%NOBLESVILLE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $400 → 5%MSD of Martinsville Scholarships: $4k → 9%Vincent Village: $375 → 12%LITTLE RED DOOR AGENCY-KIDS CANCER CAMP: $700 → 16%HOOSIER BURN CAMP: $700 → 19%Godsplaining: $650 → 17%MARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 9%LITTLE RED DOOR AGENCY-KIDS CANCER CAMP: $700 → 16%HOOSIER BURN CAMP: $400 → 19%DOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION: $400 → 17%MARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $600 → 16%MARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF INDIANAPOLIS: $400 → 16%MARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FT WAYNE: $700 → 12%MORGAN CO COMM FDN: $800 → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FT WAYNE: $500 → 12%MORGAN CO COMM FDN: $700 → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FT WAYNE: $400 → 12%WESTFIELD EDUCATORS FOUNDATION: $800 → 5%MORGAN CO COMM FDN: $700 → 9%WESTFIELD EDUCATORS FOUNDATION: $800 → 5%MORGAN CO COMM FDN: $700 → 9%Westfiled Education Foundation: $750 → 5%MORGAN CO COMM FDN: $400 → 9%WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $700 → 5%WESTFIELD EDUCATORS FOUNDATION: $700 → 5%WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $700 → 5%WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $700 → 5%Westfield Education Foundation: $700 → 5%MATTHEW 25: $400 → 16%CARDINAL RITTER HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 23 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
21

Total granted

$44k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+76%

Still filing today

22%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HB
    HOOSIER BURN CAMP INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +127%
  • VV
    VINCENT VILLAGE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +645%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • ID
    INDIANA DENTAL ASSN FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • DF
    DOMINICAN FATHERS PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • WE
    Westfiled Education Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $750

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc

Catholic Charities Bloomington is committed to enhancing the availability of quality mental health services in the communities it serves. We do this through the delivery of professional mental health education and counseling on a sliding…

2
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

3
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
5
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

6
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
7
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Indianapolis Inc

Catholic Charities of Archdiocese of Indianapolis, Inc strives to live the gospel by embodying the compassion of Christ and exercising leadership in: advocating policies and action that protect human life and dignity, promoting awareness…

Religion
8
Wabash Valley Goodwill Inc

Goodwill industries is a nonprofit provider of employment and other critical community based services for people who have a disability, people who lack education or job experience, households facing economic challenges, and others in need.

Employment
9
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Indianapolis Inc

Bgci believes that every young person deserves to live a life filled with hope and opportunity. because we care about our young people, we provide a safe, educational, and positive atmosphere where they can prosper and reach their full…

11
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

12
Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of Monroe County Inc

The VIM Clinic provides primary and preventive health care, dental, mental health, medications and health education without cost to medically underserved individuals in Monroe and Owen counties, Indiana. Household incomes for patients fall…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Teachers Treasures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MSD OF MARTINSVILLE SCHOLARSHIPS — $7,200 · OtherMSD OF MARTINSVILLE SCHOLARSHIPSMARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL — $4,600 · OtherMARTINSVILLE HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $3,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMORGAN CO COMM FDN — $3,300 · OtherMORGAN CO COMM FDNCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FT WAYNE — $2,690 · OtherNOBLESVILLE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $2,600 · OtherWESTFIELD EDUCATORS FOUNDATION — $2,300 · OtherWESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL — $2,100 · OtherSACRED HEART FOOD PANTRY — $1,800 · Other+35 more — $21,535 · Other+35 moreHOOSIER BURN CAMP INC — $2,950 · HealthMATTHEW 25 INC — $400 · HealthVINCENT VILLAGE INC — $2,150 · Housing & ShelterTEACHERS TREASURES INC — $600 · EducationETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $300 · Religion
Other$51,725Health$3,350Housing & Shelter$2,150Education$600Religion$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOOSIER BURN CAMP INC — $2,950 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVINCENT VILLAGE INC — $2,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities Indianapolis Inc — $1,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC — $725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEACHERS TREASURES INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOOSIER BURN CAMP INC
  • Who funds VINCENT VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC
  • Who funds TEACHERS TREASURES INC
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Mary Cross Tippmann Foundation · Michael & Grace Mastrangelo Foundation · Charlie Tippmann Foundation Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray Huser Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ray Huser Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ray Huser Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph