Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray Ellison Jr Charitable Trust Ray Ellison Jr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$145kFood & Nutrition$80kHealth$60kCommunity Improvement$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kInternational$15kEducation$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG$15,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
THE CARING PLACE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 10%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 10%Meals On Wheels: $5k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 10%Meals On Wheels: $5k → 10%Meals On Wheels: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$355k · 11 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$355k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

55%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +8%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Brookwood Comunity In Georgetown
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AE
    ANSON ENGINE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

2
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

5
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
6
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
7
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

8
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
10
Citymeals-On-Wheels

Citymeals-on-wheels provides a continuous lifeline of nutritious food and human company to homebound elderly new yorkers, helping them live with dignity in their own familiar homes and communities. 100% of all public donations are used for…

Food & Nutrition
11
Roadrunner Food Bank Inc

To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.

Food & Nutrition
12
Tarrant Area Food Bank

Tarrant Area Food Bank's (TAFB) mission is empowering our community to alleviate hunger and improve health. We value and embrace a culture of fairness and inclusion as fundamental to our vision of empowering communities where no one has to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Salvation Army — $75,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyThe Brookwood Community in Georgetown — $75,000 · OtherThe Brookwood Community in GeorgetownTHE CARING PLACE — $25,000 · OtherTHE CARING PLACEDells Children Hospital — $25,000 · OtherDells Children HospitalBIG — $15,000 · OtherBIGAMERICAN RED CROSS — $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSThe Brookwood Comunity In Georgetown — $15,000 · OtherThe Brookwood Comunity In GeorgetownDELL CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $20,000 · Other+4 moreCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $45,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA …MEALS ON WHEELS — $30,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education
Other$275,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Human Services$45,000Health$25,000Religion$15,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $30,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNICORN CENTERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetI AM THAT GIRL — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNICORN CENTERS INC
  • Who funds I AM THAT GIRL
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray Ellison Jr Charitable Trust Ray Ellison Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph