· Private foundation
Rasba Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k68 grants · $105k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mikva USA | $27,000 |
| Reb Meir Baal Hanes | $25,000 |
| 157 Skillman 2B LLS | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Gates of Mercy | $9,000 |
| UTA | $6,800 |
| Cong Shaara Chesed | $5,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Avosine | $5,000 |
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION FOR PRESERVATION OF JEWISH CEMETARIES | $5,000 |
| Yeshiva Kehilath Yakov | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Mesamchei Lev | $3,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
62 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TTTALMUD TORAH DNITRA3× · 2021–2023 · $561k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $507k
- MUMIKVAH USA INC6× · 2019–2024 · $175k · revenue +121%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $85k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $50k
- TMTHE MAKAVE FUNDone grant, 2021 · $36k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food baskets for the poor on the jewish holidays
Assistance to the indigent
To spread the philosophies of the holy Rabbi Jacob Joseph Twersky from Square Ukraine by printing his philosophies and lectures for the public. The organization also provides assistance to religious schools and religious non-profit…
To conduct and maintain a House of Worship in accordance with the Jewish faith and to conduct all communal affairs necessary for a viable community.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Ani Mamin Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Blum Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation · S&E Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · U&R Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Rasba Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rasba Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Rasba’s filings →