· Public charity
Rapid Resist Action
The organization purpose is for social welfare, specifically to increase civic engagement by encouraging voters and citizens to attend events that promote public policy issues.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONTEST EVERY RACE PAC | $210,000 |
| NEVADA POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| FLORIDA MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| GEORGIA MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| NEVADA MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| TEXAS POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| FLORIDA POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| MICHIGAN POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| WISCONSIN MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA PROGRESS INCUBATOR | $150,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| ARIZONA POLITICAL INNOVATIONS | $150,000 |
| TEXAS MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA MOVEMENT LABS | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2024–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rapid Resist Action?
Find your warmest path to Rapid Resist Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.