Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rama P Mukherjee Charitable Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$236kEnvironment$144kCommunity Improvement$58kHuman Services$40kFood & Nutrition$33kYouth Development$20kHealth$6k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $178k
$19,450
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$41,204
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$31,468
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$26,062
CARE USA$20,839
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$19,450
ODC INC$16,749
MERCY CORPS$11,606
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,799
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM$6,000
OXFAM AMERICA$4,054
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $19k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$473k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+64%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $94k · revenue +28%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $79k · revenue -13%
  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $77k

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $77,402 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSODC INC: $57,583 · OtherODC INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,325 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYMERCY CORPS: $39,802 · OtherMERCY CORPSENC INC: $20,000 · OtherENC INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $79,234 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $57,916 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RE…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $14,878 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $6,268 · InternationalWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $93,958 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $32,706 · Human ServicesMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $6,000 · Health
Other$245,112International$158,296Environment$93,958Human Services$32,706Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $93,958 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $79,234 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $57,916 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $32,706 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $14,878 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $6,268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rama P Mukherjee Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rama P Mukherjee Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rama P Mukherjee Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph