Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph L & June M Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$140kHousing & Shelter$92kHuman Services$20kEducation$7kCrime & Legal$7kRecreation & Sports$6kInternational$2kYouth Development$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$318k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart$30,000
New Reach$10,000
Fistula Foundation$3,000
r Kids Inc$1,500
Center of Childrens Advoacy$1,500
BH Care$1,500
Children in Placement$1,500
FINCA$1,000
Jack and Jill Children Center$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AHRC$1,000
Pinion Inc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%r Kids Inc: $2k → 12%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%r Kids Inc: $1k → 12%Jack and Jill Children Center: $1k → 13%r Kids Inc: $1k → 12%JACK AND JILL CHILDRENS CENTER: $500 → 13%r Kids Inc: $1k → 12%Jack and Jill Childrens Center: $500 → 13%r Kids Inc: $500 → 12%r Kids: $500 → 12%'R KIDS INC: $500 → 12%r Kids: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 14 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$230k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-5%

Still filing today

71%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Fistula Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +42%
  • JA
    JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +5%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • MV
    Michal Vincent Sage Dragonheart
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • MV
    Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Fn
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • MV
    Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -5% · 31% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.

—
2
Connecticut Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.

Crime & Legal
3
Family Institute of Connecticut Inc

Research and education on family values

Civil Rights
4
Family and Children's Aid Inc

Fca is a community-based behavioral health center that offers innovation, responsive and traditional mental health care and services for children, adolescents, adults and their families.

Human Services
5
Favor Inc

To advocate and amplify the power of connecticut's diverse families who have children with behavioral and mental health challenges to lead and transform the children's service systems.

Health
6
Safe Futures Inc

The mission of Safe Futures is to stop abuse, restore hope, and save lives for those impacted by domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, trafficking, elder abuse, and child abuse in southeastern Connecticut.

Human Services
7
Connecticut Partnership for Children Inc

Connecticut partnership for children, inc., is dedicated to supporting low- income children throughout connecticut, by working with their families and the communities in which they live.

Human Services
8
Focus Center for Autism Inc

Focus center for autism: helping children and adults with autism achieve their full potential.

Education
9
Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc

Advancing individual and community health

Human Services
10
Connecticut Association for the Education of Young Children Inc

To enhance the care, education, and development of Connecticut's young children, in the context of family, and community; and to support the professionals who care for them. CTAEYC provides training to increase the competencies of…

—
11
Children's Advocacy Center of Suffolk County Inc

To unite public, private and community partners to ensure safety, healing and justice for children and families impacted by violence, exploitation and abuse.

Crime & Legal
12
Connecticut Family Support Network

The connecticut family support network exists to help families raising children with disabilities and special healthcare needs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Childrens Advocacy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pinion Inc co Koutoulas & Relis Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart: $70,000 · OtherMichael Vincent Sage DragonheartMichal Vincent Sage Dragonheart: $15,500 · OtherMichal Vincent Sage DragonheartMichael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Fn: $15,000 · OtherMichael Vincent Sage Dragonheart FnAHRC: $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · Other+5 more: $4,000 · OtherNEW REACH INC: $91,500 · Housing & ShelterNEW REACH INCThe Fistula Foundation: $19,000 · HealthThe Fistu…BHcare Inc: $4,500 · HealthBHcare In…Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPinion Inc co Koutoulas & Relis LLC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $7,000 · Human Services'R KIDS INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC: $6,000 · Civil RightsFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · InternationalBRIDGEPORT AREA YOUTH MINISTRY INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$120,000Housing & Shelter$91,500Health$23,500Philanthropy$15,500Human Services$13,500Civil Rights$6,000International$2,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW REACH INC: $91,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget'R KIDS INC: $6,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPinion Inc co Koutoulas & Relis LLC: $5,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBHcare Inc: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT AREA YOUTH MINISTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW REACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Michael Vincent Sage Dragonheart Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 'R KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pinion Inc co Koutoulas & Relis LLC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT AREA YOUTH MINISTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundation IncCT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Ethel & Abe Lapides Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Yale University · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph L & June M Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph L & June M Rossi Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • 'R Kids Inc: 82% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc: 68% of income from government
  • The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc: 49% of income from government
  • New Reach Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Children in Placement Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Center for Childrens Advocacy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph L & June M Rossi’s filings →

More from the funding graph