Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ralph & Dorothy Hartwell Schugar Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$299kFood & Nutrition$155kPhilanthropy$103kAnimals$73kEducation$71kHealth$58kYouth Development$26kCivil Rights$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION$25,000
JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHIL$7,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$6,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH$5,500
W PA SCHOOL FOR BLIND CHILDREN$5,000
HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE$3,500
ANIMAL FRIENDS$3,500
JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$3,500
TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$2,500
PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION$2,500
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$2,500
ANIMAL FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $20k → 11%St Andrews Legacy: $3k → 16%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 14%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $20k → 11%St Andrews Legacy: $2k → 16%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $19k → 11%St Andrews Legacy: $2k → 16%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $17k → 11%St Andrews Legacy: $2k → 16%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $17k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $17k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $15k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $15k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $15k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $6k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $4k → 11%TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES: $3k → 11%TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERV: $4k → 11%TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES: $3k → 11%TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $8k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $8k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $8k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$711k · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -42% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$711k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-42%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +70%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +102%
  • AF
    Animal Friends Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IU
    ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -42%
  • YS
    YESHIVA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
3
Jewish Family Services of Delaware Inc

To strengthen individuals, families, and the community by providing counseling and support services. inspired by the fundamental jewish value that "we are all responsible for one another", jfs supports people of all backgrounds by…

Human Services
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
6
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Family Services of Northeastern New York Inc

To enrich the lives of individuals and families from all backgrounds and strengthen the community by providing compassionate, collaborative human services, guided by jewish values.

Human Services
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Family Service of Greater Harrisburg Inc

To help individuals and families meet life's challenges. jewish family service is a forward-thinking mental health and social service agency dedicated to helping people achieve their full potential while honoring choice, diversity, and…

Health
10
The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation

To unite, sustain, and enhance the st. paul jewish community and strengthen bonds with jewish communities in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Association On Aging and the most unlike its peers is St Andrews Legacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GTR PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $155,000 · OtherTHE GTR PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANKWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR BLIND — $54,500 · OtherWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR BLINDCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH — $33,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHIndividual grant recipient — $23,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $20,500 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEJEWISH HOME FOR BABIES AND CHILDREN FUND — $19,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION — $18,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF WESTERN PA — $15,500 · Other+4 more — $23,000 · Other+4 moreJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $155,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGINGWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $42,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $41,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE…TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES — $10,500 · Human ServicesST ANDREWS LEGACY INC — $9,000 · Human Services+2 more — $9,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $70,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH …THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH…Animal Friends Inc — $31,000 · AnimalsHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE — $17,000 · AnimalsSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $21,000 · Civil RightsISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$362,000Human Services$267,000Philanthropy$105,000Animals$48,000Health$25,000Civil Rights$21,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $155,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $42,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $41,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc — $31,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION — $25,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE — $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES — $10,500 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS LEGACY INC — $9,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds Animal Friends Inc
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds TOYS FOR PITTSBURGH TIKES
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS LEGACY INC
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of SouthwesternPA14× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ralph & Dorothy Hartwell Schugar Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ralph & Dorothy Hartwell Schugar Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Ralph & Dorothy Hartwell Schugar Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph