Skip to content
Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$48kYouth Development$46kHealth$14kPhilanthropy$12kReligion$4kInternational$1kCivil Rights$1kArts & Culture$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRI LANKA ARMY WELFARE FUND$28,851
JCHULIPURAM EAST AMERICAN MISSION TAMIL MIXED SCHOOL$6,156
RCOBEC FOUNDATION INC$6,000
LADIES' COLLEGE OLD GIRLS' ASSOCIATION$1,000
ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC$1,000
SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND$500
NEW JERSEY TAMIL ARTS AND CULTURAL SOCIETY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 62% of grant dollars ($82k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 38% that went abroad ($49k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $3k → 11%SRI LANKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA EASTERN REGION INC: $5k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY DANCE MARATHON: $200 → 8%ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC: $1k → 15%MARKET STREET MISSION: $750 → 4%ALPINE LEARNING GROUP: $300 → 7%NEW JERSEY TAMIL ARTS AND CULTURAL SOCIETY: $400 → 8%SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $500 → 10%AMHE-NJ CHAPTER: $2k → 16%ST PETER'S COLLEGE OBU WASHINGTON DC: $2k → 6%LADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI OF GREATER SWASHINGTON: $4k → 8%ALPINE LEARNING GROUP: $200 → 7%ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $11k → 8%SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $500 → 10%AMHE NJ CHAPTER: $2k → 16%LADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI: $2k → 8%ALPINE LEARNING GROUP: $150 → 7%RCOBEC: $8k → 8%SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $500 → 10%E O COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $3k → 16%LADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI OF GREATER WASHINTON: $1k → 8%ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $7k → 8%SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $200 → 10%SLMANA INC: $5k → 16%LADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI OF GREATER SWASHINGTON: $1k → 8%RCOBEC FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 8%SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $200 → 10%GHANA ASSOCIATION FOR MEDICAL AID: $1k → 16%ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $6k → 8%ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $5k → 8%ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 38% of all-years giving ($49k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Sri Lanka$46k · 6 grants
India$3k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 6 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$52k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-47%

Still filing today

33%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $33k
  • SF
    SUDHAAR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k
  • LC
    LADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI OF GREATER WASHINGTON
    3× · 2019–2022 · $6k

Funded once

  • R
    RCOBEC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • S
    SLMNA
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • SI
    SLMANA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBEC: $33,000 · OtherROYAL COLLEGE OLD BOYS' EAST COAST FOUNDATION - RCOBECSRI LANKA ARMY WELFARE FUND: $28,851 · OtherSRI LANKA ARMY WELFARE FUNDRCOBEC: $8,000 · OtherRCOBECSUDHAAR FOUNDATION: $6,621 · OtherSUDHAAR FOUNDATIONJCHULIPURAM EAST AMERICAN MISSION TAMIL MIXED SCHOOL: $6,156 · OtherLADIES COLLEGE ALUMNI OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $6,000 · OtherSLMNA: $6,000 · OtherSLMANA INC: $5,000 · OtherSRI LANKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION NORTH AMERICA EASTERN REGION INC: $5,000 · Other+11 more: $13,780 · Other+11 moreRCOBEC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropySUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $1,900 · PhilanthropyPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGHANA ASSOCIATION FOR MEDICAL AID INC: $1,000 · HealthALPINE LEARNING GROUP EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $650 · Education
Other$118,408Philanthropy$7,900Arts & Culture$2,500Health$1,000Education$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRCOBEC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSRI LANKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION NORTH AMERICA EASTERN REGION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $1,900 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALPINE LEARNING GROUP EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RCOBEC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SRI LANKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION NORTH AMERICA EASTERN REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND ↗
  • Who funds GHANA ASSOCIATION FOR MEDICAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE LEARNING GROUP EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rajiyah Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rajiyah Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home