· Public charity
RaiseUp Foundation Inc
Further philanthropy by providing a service that will make charitable giving simple and efficient while satisfying all legal requirments and provide donors with a record for tax purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $25,598 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $92,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $67,268 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Green Bay Area Public School District | $10,000 |
| Golden Retriever Rescue of WI | $9,075 |
| DC Everest High School Band | $6,523 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DEDC Everest Highschool2× · 2019–2020 · $29k
- FDFOND DU LAC FUSION VBC2× · 2019–2020 · $22k · revenue -22%
- GRGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC2× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- OWOne Wisconsin Volleyball Clubone grant, 2019 · $44k
- THTRIM HUNGER INCone grant, 2019 · $37k
- WDWisconsin Dance and Cheerone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose for which the VBB is formed are: 1. To enhance the cultural experiences of the following Victor High School clubs: Victor Marching Band Victor Indoor Percussion Ensemble Cadet Winterguard and Varsity Winterguard. Hereinafter to…
To provide support for Oconomowoc High School Band Program
To support the student musicians, parents, and teachers of the Lakeville South High School Band Program by recruiting volunteers, raising funds, and conducting events.
To provide support and opportunities in music and activities for the Bemidji Marching Band.
The badger region volleyball association promotes initiatives for safe, structured and fun life long volleyball experiences through education, promotion and development of the sport of volleyball in wisconsin.
Summit Band Boosters Inc. supports student band activities.
Support School Band Activities
The bruin band boosters' mission is to support the rock bridge high school band program.
Support Huntley High School Band Program
Fundraising activities for high school marching band.
High school band booster
The mission of the RVBB is to provide both moral and financial support to the Marching Band and other Instrumental Performing Groups through cooperative and organized efforts. All activities will support the policies and programs of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden Retriever Rescue of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRIM HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds FOND DU LAC FUSION VBC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
- Who funds St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s ↗
- Who funds BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Rincon University Marching Band Association ↗
- Who funds AMERY BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization RaiseUp Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to RaiseUp Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to RaiseUp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.