Skip to content

· Private foundation

Radiology Inc Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$168kPhilanthropy$66kHuman Services$16kHousing & Shelter$16kFood & Nutrition$13kEducation$10kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$257
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Beacon Health Foundation$2,500
HANNAHS HOUSE$1,250
Faith Mission of Elkhart$1,250
Foodbank of Northern Indiana$1,250
State Street The Pax Center$1,250
IVY Tech Foundation$1,000
American Cancer Society$1,000
Ronald McDonald House$1,000
Beacons Children Hospital$1,000
Goshen Health Fund$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Center for Hospice$1,000
Hope Ministries$1,000
Riverbend Cancer Services$850
Center for the Homeless$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ADEC: $500 → 13%ADEC: $500 → 13%ADEC: $500 → 13%ADEC: $300 → 13%HANNAH'S HOUSE: $250 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $500 → 13%REAL SERVICES: $500 → 13%Real Services: $500 → 13%Real Services: $300 → 13%ADEC: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 57 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
24

Total granted

$262k
$224k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+1%

Still filing today

39%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $92k · revenue +23%
  • BH
    Beacon Health Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +586%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $103k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • OF
    Oaklawn Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
2
Iowa City Hospice Inc

To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.

Human Services
3
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
6
Deaconess Health System Inc

At deaconess health system, our values are based on our commitment to quality. we define quality as the continuous improvement of services to meet the needs and exceed the expectations of the customers we serve. continued on schedule oour…

Health
7
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
8
Respite Care Services Inc

To provide respite care. respite care services provides care relief to families with developmentally or physically disabled family members with the goal of delaying or avoiding institutionalization.

Human Services
9
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
10
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
11
Halom House Inc

Halom house, inc. is a private, non-profit residential agency supporting adults with developmental disabilities in the southern ohio area. halom house, inc. is dedicated to upholding the rights and responsibilities of every client served;…

—
12
Indiana Health Information Exchange Inc

Through information exchange, we improve health and healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adec Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Foundation of La Porte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $103,393 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $51,697 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOaklawn Foundation: $50,608 · OtherOaklawn FoundationBEACON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $27,162 · OtherBEACON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL+62 more: $107,500 · Other+62 moreOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC: $92,129 · HealthOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER …Beacon Health Foundation Inc: $12,500 · HealthBeacon Health Foundation In…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,450 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC525 FOUNDATION INC: $4,850 · Health+2 more: $2,200 · HealthFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,475 · Food & NutritionADEC INC: $2,300 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesSt Margarets House: $2,300 · Recreation & SportsCAMP MILLHOUSE INC: $2,150 · Recreation & SportsIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 · EducationTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $750 · EducationCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $3,000 · Employment
Other$340,360Health$118,129Food & Nutrition$10,475Human Services$6,100Recreation & Sports$4,450Education$3,550Employment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC: $92,129 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,475 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH MISSION OF ELKHART INC: $5,675 over 5y, 0.0% of budget525 FOUNDATION INC: $4,850 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $3,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Margarets House: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADEC INC: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP MILLHOUSE INC: $2,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES: $2,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChiara Home Inc: $1,800 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CASIE CENTER INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE STAR LIFE INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $1,175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $1,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Beacon Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH MISSION OF ELKHART INC ↗
  • Who funds 525 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Logan Community Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds St Margarets House ↗
  • Who funds ADEC INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MILLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Chiara Home Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN44.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · The Specialized Staffing Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · Asante Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Vera Z Dwyer Charitable Trust Uad 121920

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Radiology Inc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Radiology Inc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Radiology Inc Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Radiology Inc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Radiology’s filings →

    More from the funding graph