Skip to content

Virginia · Private foundation

Radiant Point Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$3.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Radiant Point Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 13% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving6$32k50%
FY20234$21k50%
FY20222$10k0%
FY20212$30k50%
FY20202$51k100%
FY20171$500n/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$124kEnvironment$16kInternational$2kRecreation & Sports$500Health$500Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Virginia Native Plant Society Inc$15,00043%
Student and Global Community Engagement$1,8002n/a
The Clifton Institute Inc$1,00010%
Simple Changes Inc$50010%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($126k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Radiant Point Foundation with peer funders

About Radiant Point Foundation

How much does Radiant Point Foundation give?
Radiant Point Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $31,830 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Radiant Point Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (86%), Environment (11%), International (1%).
Who are Radiant Point Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Virginia Native Plant Society Inc ($15k), Student and Global Community Engagement ($2k), The Clifton Institute Inc ($1k).
Does Radiant Point Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Radiant Point Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Radiant Point Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Radiant Point Foundation based?
Radiant Point Foundation is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Radiant Point’s filings →

More from the funding graph