Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raabe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$134k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.2MReligion$552kCivil Rights$250kHuman Services$75kPublic Benefit$400
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$867k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC$30,000
INSTITUTIONAL MINISTRIES$25,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE$20,000
FRIENDS NETWORK$15,000
KINGDOM WORKERS$15,000
KINGDOM PREP LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$9,500
WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD$9,131
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS NETWORK: $15k → 6%INSTITUTIONAL MINISTRIES: $25k → 5%BADGER BOYS STATE: $400 → 8%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $138k → 17%KINGDOM WORKERS: $100k → 5%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $114k → 17%KINGDOM WORKERS: $20k → 5%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $109k → 17%KINGDOM WORKERS: $20k → 5%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $98k → 17%KINGDOM WORKERS: $15k → 5%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $97k → 17%WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD: $9k → 5%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $94k → 17%CHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH & SCHOOL: $152k → 5%KINGDOM WORKERS: $25k → 17%CHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH & SCHOOL: $126k → 5%KINGDOM WORKERS: $25k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $20k → 17%KINGDOM WORKERS: $20k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $12k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $223k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $111k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $34k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $33k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 17%KINGDOM PREP LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 17%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $70k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $30k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 6 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$2.0M
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $681k · revenue +33%
  • WL
    WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +48%
  • WE
    WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • BB
    BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $400 · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $681,268 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INCWISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $535,471 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLCHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH & SCHOOL: $278,000 · OtherCHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH & SCHOOLTHE SALVATION ARMY TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS: $75,000 · Other+3 more: $44,131 · OtherWELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $250,000 · Civil RightsWELS LUTHERAN…WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC: $225,000 · ReligionWISCONSIN EV…FRIENDS NETWORK: $15,000 · InternationalBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $400 · Youth Development
Other$1,613,870Civil Rights$250,000Religion$225,000International$15,000Youth Development$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $681,268 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC: $250,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC: $225,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS NETWORK: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Antioch Foundation 1015002041WI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Antioch Foundation 1015002041 · Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Baird Foundation Inc · Holzhueter Foundation · Stimac Family Foundation · John and Peggy Zimdars Foundation · Robert a and Lynn I Doneff Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raabe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raabe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raabe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph