Skip to content

· Private foundation

R & T Robertson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$49kEducation$39kHuman Services$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kFood & Nutrition$14kCrime & Legal$10kEmployment$6k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$294k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN$5,000
CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM$5,000
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$3,000
MISSION OF MERCY$3,000
HCA HEALTHCARE HOPE FUND$3,000
HALO - FLIGHT$2,000
MISSION 911$2,000
CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES$2,000
FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS$2,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $3k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $2k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $1k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $1k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $1k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES: $1k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$146k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$146k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +356%
  • HF
    HALO FLIGHT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +85%
  • CS
    Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
    4× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD'S CORNER
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -16%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERISTY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christus Good Shepherd Medical Center

To serve the community with respect to providing healthcare services and healthcare education regardless of race, sex, creed, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay.

Health
2
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
3
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
4
Christus Health

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
5
Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the health ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
6
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Christus Health Ark-La-Tex

Support the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
8
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
9
Christus Health Southeast Texas

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the teachings of the catholic church.

Health
10
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
11
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Southern Sector Health Initiative

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus Spohn Health System Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Good Shepherd's Corner. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL SCHOOLMISSION 911: $19,000 · OtherMISSION 911HALO FLIGHT INC: $18,000 · OtherHALO FLIGHT INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $15,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTINPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM: $10,000 · OtherPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAMGOOD SHEPHERD'S CORNER: $6,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD'S CORNER+2 more: $5,000 · Other+2 moreFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS …CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC: $14,000 · Human ServicesCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRI…GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $6,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN …MISSION OF MERCY INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF MERCY INCChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $16,000 · HealthChristus Sp…Baylor College of Medicine: $9,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $2,000 · Education
Other$93,000Human Services$42,000Health$16,000Education$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHALO FLIGHT INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD'S CORNER: $6,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HALO FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD'S CORNER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Laverne & Thomas Howell FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R & T Robertson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R & T Robertson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on R & T Robertson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph