Skip to content
R&R Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

R&R Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$408kYouth Development$75kHuman Services$53kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCARC$60,000
POPE JOHN HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BLAIR ACADEMY$15,000
NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $612k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCARC: $120k → 6%SCARC: $77k → 6%SCARC: $70k → 6%SCARC: $65k → 6%SCARC: $60k → 6%SCARC: $60k → 6%SCARC: $60k → 6%SCARC: $60k → 6%PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY: $10k → 6%PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY: $10k → 6%PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY: $10k → 6%PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 13 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$3.3M
$357k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-19%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BLAIR ACADEMY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
  • SI
    SCARC INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $572k · revenue +47%
  • PS
    PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • HC
    HILLTOP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -11%
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY STATE FAIR
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Self-Sufficiency of Sussex County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mountain Rescue Aspen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $878,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNewton Memorial Hospital: $438,500 · OtherNewton Memorial HospitalHILLTOP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $150,000 · OtherHILLTOP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCNEW JERSEY STATE FAIR: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherBOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $75,000 · OtherPOPE JOHN HIGH SCHOOL: $75,000 · Other+6 more: $100,500 · OtherBLAIR ACADEMY: $1,099,500 · EducationBLAIR ACADEMY+2 more: $42,500 · EducationSCARC INC: $572,000 · Human ServicesSCARC INCPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT SELF-SUFFI…Paper Mill Playhouse: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMountain Rescue Aspen Inc: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCATHERINE PEACHEY FUND INC: $2,500 · HealthThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthKAREN ANN QUINLAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,892,000Education$1,142,000Human Services$612,000Arts & Culture$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Health$3,500Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLAIR ACADEMY: $1,099,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSCARC INC: $572,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHILLTOP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $150,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPaper Mill Playhouse: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTH HAVEN INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMountain Rescue Aspen Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKAREN ANN QUINLAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SCARC INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Paper Mill Playhouse ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Rescue Aspen Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHERINE PEACHEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KAREN ANN QUINLAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John a and Margaret P…Community Foundation …American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
John a and Margaret Post FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R&R Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R&R Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Paper Mill Playhouse: 9% of income from government
  • Scarc Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Blair Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R&R Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home