Skip to content

· Private foundation

R & H Prashker Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$583k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MReligion$363kHuman Services$207kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$100,000
NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEME$75,000
ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS$75,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$37,000
EPIPHANY CHURCH$30,000
OUR LADY OF VISITATION CHURCH$30,000
NEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
HOOVER SCHOOL PTA$25,000
NMPD PBA 83$20,000
SAINT NICHOLAS CHURCH$20,000
CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION$10,000
NMPD PBA 186$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $166k → 14%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST: $15k → 7%ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $100k → 14%ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $125k → 14%NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $37k → 14%NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $80k → 7%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEME: $80k → 7%NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $80k → 7%INSTITUTE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEMENT: $80k → 7%INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEME: $75k → 7%CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $46k → 7%NEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY: $30k → 7%NMPD PBA 83: $20k → 7%NMPD PBA 83: $15k → 7%NEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY: $15k → 7%DARREN DRAKE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $10k → 7%NMPD PBA: $6k → 7%CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $6k → 7%NMPD PBA: $5k → 7%NMPD PBA 186: $1k → 7%NMPD PBA 186: $1k → 7%SAINT NICHOLAS CHURCH: $20k → 7%BLOOM EMPOWERMENT: $30k → 7%HOOVER SCHOOL PTA: $25k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $125k → 7%BLOOM EMPOWERMENT: $24k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $75k → 7%HOOVER SCHOOL PTA: $20k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $53k → 7%HOOVER SCHOOL PTA: $12k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $8k → 7%BLOOM EMPOWERMENT: $10k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $8k → 7%OUR LADY OF VISITATION CHURCH: $35k → 7%OUR LADY OF VISITATION CHURCH: $30k → 7%EPIPHANY CHURCH: $30k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +570% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+570%
+64%

Still filing today

18%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $291k
  • AO
    ACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS
    5× · 2017–2024 · $268k
  • NM
    NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $260k · revenue +570% · 62% of their budget

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $291,450 · OtherST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLINDACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELS: $268,000 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY ANGELSINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEME: $155,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMECONCORDIA LEARNING CENTER AT ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $100,000 · OtherCONCORDIA LEARNING CENTER AT ST JOSEPHS SCHOOL FOR THE BLINDINSTITUTE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEMENT: $80,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEMENTOUR LADY OF VISITATION CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $64,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $62,000 · OtherHOOVER SCHOOL PTA: $57,000 · Other+8 more: $160,000 · Other+8 moreNEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $260,000 · EducationNEW MILFORD EDUCATI…+2 more: $15,000 · Education+2 moreNEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY 2 INC: $45,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,302,450Education$275,000Public Safety & Disaster$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $260,000 over 3y, 62% of budgetNEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY 2 INC: $45,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW MILFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD FIRE COMPANY 2 INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R & H Prashker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R & H Prashker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R & H Prashker’s filings →

More from the funding graph