Skip to content

· Private foundation

R a Stevens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$562kEducation$525kYouth Development$165kHousing & Shelter$138kHealth$113kCrime & Legal$98kEnvironment$74kReligion$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $186k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$75,000
SHARP LITERACY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NOTRE DAME MIDDLE SCHOOL$16,200
ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI$15,000
TEENS GROW GREENS$10,000
ADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE COUNTY INC$10,000
KATHY'S HOUSE INC$10,000
ACTS HOUSING$10,000
URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC$10,000
MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION$6,000
WOMEN'S CENTER$5,000
MILWAUKEE FILM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOMEN'S CENTER: $8k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%SHARP LITERACY: $30k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $15k → 5%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $13k → 5%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $11k → 5%SHARP LITERACY: $3k → 17%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $10k → 5%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $10k → 5%ELMBROOK SENIOR TAXI: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $15k → 17%FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $10k → 17%FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $10k → 17%FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $10k → 17%FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES INC: $5k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $5k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $5k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $5k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $25k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $25k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $25k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $25k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $25k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $15k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 41 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
11

Total granted

$2.1M
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +36%
  • URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +113%
  • EN
    ELMBROOK NEW BERLIN SENIOR TAXIINC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $64k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +97%
  • MI
    MESSMER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • AL
    ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc

The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.

Employment
2
Groundwork Milwaukee Inc

Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…

Environment
3
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
4
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
5
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
7
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
8
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
9
NourishMKE Inc

We're a network of community food centers that specializes in food, love, and community. Hunger is a real problem, and access to food should be a fundamental right. No one should be made to feel they're not deserving of nourishment when…

Food & Nutrition
10
Legacy Redevelopment Corporation

Legacy redevelopment corporation (lrc) is a non-profit community development financial institution (cdfi) revolving loan fund whose mission is to enhance neighborhood vitality, facilitate a sustainable and economically diverse community,…

Housing & Shelter
11
Journey House Inc

Journey house empowers families on milwaukee's near southside to move out of poverty by offering adult education, youth development, workforce readiness, and family engagement.

Human Services
12
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy Services of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sharp Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INC: $227,194 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INCIndividual grant recipient: $133,796 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $100,260 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $95,000 · OtherPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INCADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE COUNTY INC: $95,000 · OtherADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE COUNTY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $90,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBFAMILY SERVICE OF WAUKESHA: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherERAS SENIOR NETWORK INC: $47,500 · Other+25 more: $417,547 · Other+25 moreSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE…ELMBROOK NEW BERLIN SENIOR TAXIINC: $64,150 · Human ServicesELMBROOK NEW BERLIN SE…SHARP LITERACY INC: $57,500 · Human ServicesSHARP LITERACY INCFRIENDS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS INCTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INCPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE …SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $50,000 · EducationMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $30,000 · EducationLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $20,975 · EducationADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $10,000 · EducationACADEMY OF BASIC EDUCATION INC: $4,590 · EducationCore El Centro Incorporated: $55,000 · HealthKathy's House Inc: $50,000 · HealthURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $73,796 · EnvironmentMILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentJUNEAU PARK FRIENDS INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $61,000 · Housing & ShelterCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $55,000 · Religion
Other$1,311,297Human Services$429,150Education$115,565Health$105,000Environment$84,796Housing & Shelter$61,000Religion$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $170,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $95,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $73,796 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetELMBROOK NEW BERLIN SENIOR TAXIINC: $64,150 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $61,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC: $57,500 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCore El Centro Incorporated: $55,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $47,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetERAS SENIOR NETWORK INC: $47,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetDOMINICAN CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $40,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHope Center Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $29,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $20,975 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTEENS GROW GREENS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNEAU PARK FRIENDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPROJECT KINDRED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN SOUTHEAST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY OF BASIC EDUCATION INC: $4,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE NAVIGATORS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PHILANTHROPY NETWORK INC: $1,480 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMBROOK NEW BERLIN SENIOR TAXIINC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Core El Centro Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ERAS SENIOR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEWTHREADS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MKE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS GROW GREENS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI55.5× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Weiss Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Brewers Community Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Otto Bremer Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R a Stevens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R a Stevens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to R a Stevens Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to R a Stevens Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on R a Stevens Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph