Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Illinois · Private foundation

Quercia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$30k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$20,000
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$11M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
40% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$20kHealth$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chicago Cares Inc$20,00010%
Dare2tri Paratriathlon Club$10,00011%

Compare Quercia Foundation with peer funders

About Quercia Foundation

How much does Quercia Foundation give?
Quercia Foundation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $30,000, out of $305,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Quercia Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (2%), Health (1%).
Who are Quercia Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Chicago Cares Inc ($20k), Dare2tri Paratriathlon Club ($10k).
Does Quercia Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Quercia Foundation based?
Quercia Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $570k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quercia’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home