Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pulley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$895k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.8MArts & Culture$1.8MYouth Development$1.3MEducation$755kFood & Nutrition$335kPhilanthropy$250kEnvironment$195kCommunity Improvement$155kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $360k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $525k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY$75,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$50,000
COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC$50,000
THE LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$50,000
BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDENS$50,000
BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION$50,000
CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY$50,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$50,000
DARLINGTON SCHOOL$50,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$50,000
FOOD DEPOT SANTA FE$40,000
NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,000
CHATHAM HALL$30,000
GODS PANTRY$30,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $10k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $10k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $10k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 20%HOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
CO
MO
KY
VA
NM
TN
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 19 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$5.5M
$730k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+62%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $445k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +1%
  • TB
    TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +29% · 32% of their budget
  • WO
    WASHINGTON OPERA HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $550k · revenue +108% · 88% of their budget

Funded once

  • HF
    HAYSWOOD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +164%
  • GP
    GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +16%
  • BV
    BRAVO VAIL
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakewood Theatre Company

To inspire and nurture a love of theatre and the arts with the following mission: the maintenance of a permanent multi-arts and theatre facility. the sponsorship and coordination of education and cultural programming in visual arts,…

Arts & Culture
2
Vilar Performing Arts Center Inc

The purposes and objectives of the vilar performing arts center is to promote and develop awareness of and appreciation of the arts and to educate the general public about the arts through the ownership and operation of a theater by…

Arts & Culture
3
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture
4
Kansas City Ballet Association

To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance

Arts & Culture
5
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
6
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
7
Hennepin Arts

We are a non-profit that creates positive change through the arts by bringing together people, businesses and organizations to create and enjoy cultural experiences.

Arts & Culture
8
Loft Cinema Inc Fka Tucson Cinema Foundation Inc

Building community by celebrating the art and diversity of film.

Arts & Culture
9
The Richmond Ballet

Through all of its programs, richmond ballet strives to expand access to dance for the benefit of the entire community. at the heart of the organization's mission, to awaken, uplift, and unite human spirits, is the conviction that the…

Arts & Culture
10
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
11
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
12
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hayswood Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $1,650,000 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAFWebster University: $350,000 · EducationWebster UniversityCHATHAM HALL: $280,000 · EducationCHATHAM HALL+1 more: $50,000 · EducationWASHINGTON OPERA HOUSE INC: $550,000 · OtherWASHINGTON OPERA HOUSE INCGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 · OtherGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INCBRAVO VAIL: $100,000 · OtherBRAVO VAILCHURCH OF THE NATIVITY: $100,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NATIVITYST LOUIS ZOOLOGICAL PARK: $80,000 · Other+23 more: $685,000 · Other+23 moreTOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $1,256,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOM BROWNING BOYS AN…Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $435,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Pla…Opera Theatre of Saint Louis: $275,000 · Arts & CultureOpera Theatre …VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $85,000 · Arts & CultureVAIL PERFORMIN…CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI SHA…+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHAYSWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $100,000 · PhilanthropyVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $155,000 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $75,000 · EnvironmentBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $60,000 · EnvironmentHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $15,000 · Environment
Education$2,330,000Other$1,765,000Youth Development$1,256,000Arts & Culture$860,000Philanthropy$350,000Community Improvement$155,000Environment$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $1,650,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $1,256,000 over 8y, 32% of budgetWASHINGTON OPERA HOUSE INC: $550,000 over 8y, 88% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $435,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWebster University: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM HALL: $280,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $275,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHAYSWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $85,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $60,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF HOPE INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDarlington School Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLydia's House Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetROCK 4 RESCUE: $25,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetHighlands Biological Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM HALL ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
  • Who funds HAYSWOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Darlington School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Lydia's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCK 4 RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Biological Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET ↗
  • Who funds Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Claire Adair Hendrickson Foundation IncOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Claire Adair Hendrickson Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Winmax Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pulley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pulley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pulley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pulley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pulley’s filings →

More from the funding graph