Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prp Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$222kEducation$198kYouth Development$63kArts & Culture$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $110k
$21,501
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON$45,000
BAPS$43,257
THE ITS 4 THE KIDS FOUNDATION$21,501
BASIS$2,631
MAGDALENA HOUSE$1,001
ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ANUJA SA: $1k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$471k · 4 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$471k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

25%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BAPS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $198k
  • UL
    UNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $196k · revenue +22% · 45% of their budget
  • TI
    THE ITS 4 THE KIDS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $63k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
  • MC
    MIAMI'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • WM
    Witte Museum
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
3
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Association for the Advancement of Mexican Americans

Aama's mission is to inspire and empower latinos to pursue and achieve their potential and achieve success. aama's ultimate goal is that all latinos will be able to participate fully in the economic and civic success of our community. the…

Human Services
6
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
7
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Disabilitysa dba Fiesta Especial Disabilitysa Creative Services

The mission of disabilitysa is to educate, advance, and engage people with disabiities by building connections, exchanging information, creating opportunities, and strengthening our disability community in the greater san antonio area.…

Human Services
10
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
12
Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Witte Museum; the most unlike its peers is Anuja Sa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAPS: $197,829 · OtherBAPSTHE ITS 4 THE KIDS FOUNDATION: $63,002 · OtherTHE ITS 4 THE KIDS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,955 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBASIS: $13,632 · Other+2 more: $3,500 · OtherUNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON CORPORATION: $196,423 · ReligionUNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON CORPORATIONMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC: $1,001 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $1,001 · Human ServicesANUJA SA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWitte Museum: $2,500 · Arts & CultureIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $750 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $501 · HealthDARE AMERICA: $50 · Health
Other$303,918Religion$196,423Human Services$3,002Arts & Culture$2,500Philanthropy$750Health$551

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON CORPORATION: $196,423 over 6y, 45% of budgetWitte Museum: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC: $1,001 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANUJA SA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARE AMERICA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED LEUVA OF HOUSTON CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds ANUJA SA INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds DARE AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Prp Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Prp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prp Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph