Skip to content

· Public charity

Prosperity Alliance Inc

Prosperity Alliance is committed to building a stronger economy for all Americans through enacting pro-growth economic policies.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$426k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Public Benefit$11MCivil Rights$3.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.3MCommunity Improvement$350kCrime & Legal$300kEnvironment$25k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.8M
$100,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Future American Fund$426,000
Oklahoma Conservative Renewal$420,000
Conserv Agenda for Amer$400,000
A Healthy Future$350,000
Security is Stength LLC$250,000
Ozark Gateway Leadership PAC$165,000
Defend US PAC$100,000
American Foundations Comm$95,000
The Revitalization Project$75,000
Southern Drawl PAC$65,000
Georgia For All Inc$15,000
Nevada Jobs and Growth PAC$15,000
Oklahoma Grassroots Conserv$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Heartland America: $40k → 14%Citizens for Good Government: $20k → 16%American Jobs and Growth: $700k → 14%Concerned Conservatives: $210k → 13%Ozark Gateway Leadership PAC: $165k → 8%American Foundations Comm: $95k → 11%Georgia For All Inc: $15k → 14%Jobs and Progress Fund: $75k → 15%A Public Voice: $1.0M → 16%Conserv Agenda for Amer: $400k → 16%Oklahoma Conservative Renewal: $420k → 6%The Revitalization Project: $25k → 7%American Policy Coalition: $2.8M → 9%Nevada Jobs and Growth PAC: $15k → 13%American Advancement: $773k → 11%Bluegrass Conservatives PAC: $63k → 15%Sooner State Leadership Fund: $800k → 16%LA Leadership Fund: $241k → 14%In Florida We Trust: $209k → 15%Commonsense Conservatives: $200k → 6%American Advancement: $600k → 11%The Revitalization Project: $325k → 6%Future American Fund: $426k → 11%A Healthy Future: $350k → 6%The Revitalization Project: $75k → 6%American Exceptionalism Inst: $150k → 6%American for Secure Elections: $520k → 6%NW Ohio Freedom PAC: $310k → 6%Oklahomans for Law and Order: $300k → 6%American for Secure Elections: $200k → 6%True Michigan: $145k → 6%Anne Arundel Forward: $40k → 6%Affordable Energy Fund PAC: $25k → 6%Nevada 1st PAC: $25k → 6%Anne Arundel Forward: $15k → 6%Oklahoma Grassroots Conserv: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NV
OH
KY
VA
MD
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 7 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1049% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
26

Total granted

$5.1M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1049%
-6%

Still filing today

43%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    American Advancement
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +3%
  • IA
    Independence and Freedom Network
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.1M · revenue ×11
  • TR
    The Revitalization Project
    3× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +532% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • AP
    American Policy Coalition
    one grant, 2023 · $2.8M · revenue -70%
  • SS
    Safe Streets Safe Communities
    one grant, 2023 · $2.3M · revenue -45% · 85% of their budget
  • DU
    Defend US PAC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.8M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

—
2
Government Integrity Fund

To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.

—
3
Economic Future Fund

Economic Future Fund aims to build a stronger, more vibrant economy for the American people through innovative public policies and free market solutions.

—
4
United for Clean Power

United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.

Environment
5
American Voice

American Voice's mission is to create a more prosperous, fair and free America. We seek to harness the voices of American Citizens to advance free market reforms to our laws and regulations.

—
6
Citizens for a Working America Inc

To promote sound economic policy: 1 By engaging in citizen led initiative and referendum efforts, 2 By participating in the public policy arena, and 3 By providing educational services to the general public.

—
7
American Prosperity Alliance

American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.

—
8
Advance American Democracy Inc

To protect democracy by advocating for policies to strenghten democracy, educating the public about threats to our democracy, and highlighting the unpopularity of federal policies that place money and power over the rights and freedom of…

—
9
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

—
10
Ohio Works

To engage in any lawful act or activity for which not for profit corporations may be formed under chapter 1702 of the ohio revised code or the corresponding provisions of any future ohio statute.

—
11
American Governance Foundation Inc

To study and promote positive reform of American public institutions. To this end we undertake public interest research journalism and public media especially via Palladium Magazine convene meetings workshops and community events.

Social Science
12
Minnesota Action Network Inc

To create, encourage, and promote center right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism, and strong policies in the state of MN, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Advancement; the most unlike its peers is Georgia for All Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Safe Streets Safe Communities: $2,250,000 · OtherSafe Streets Safe CommunitiesDefend US PAC: $1,750,000 · OtherDefend US PACAmerican Advancement: $1,373,467 · OtherAmerican AdvancementIndependence and Freedom Network: $1,100,000 · OtherIndependence and Freedom NetworkConservative Alliance PAC: $997,500 · OtherConservative Alliance PACSOONER STATE LEADERSHIP FUND: $800,000 · OtherAmericans for Secure Elect: $720,000 · OtherAmerican Jobs and Growth Fund: $700,000 · Other+33 more: $5,657,500 · Other+33 moreAmerican Policy Coalition: $2,750,000 · Public BenefitAmerican Policy Coali…A PUBLIC VOICE INC: $1,000,000 · Public BenefitA PUBLIC VOICE INCThe Revitalization Project: $424,750 · Community ImprovementAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $400,000 · Community Improvement
Other$15,348,467Public Benefit$3,750,000Community Improvement$824,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Policy Coalition: $2,750,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetSafe Streets Safe Communities: $2,250,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetAmerican Advancement: $1,373,467 over 2y, 11% of budgetA PUBLIC VOICE INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetAmerican Jobs and Growth Fund: $700,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetThe Revitalization Project: $424,750 over 3y, 33% of budgetAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $400,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetJOBS AND PROGRESS FUND INC: $75,000 over 1y, 63% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Policy Coalition ↗
  • Who funds Safe Streets Safe Communities ↗
  • Who funds American Advancement ↗
  • Who funds Independence and Freedom Network ↗
  • Who funds A PUBLIC VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Jobs and Growth Fund ↗
  • Who funds Defend US Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Revitalization Project ↗
  • Who funds American Exceptionalism Institute ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Agenda for America ↗
  • Who funds JOBS AND PROGRESS FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American AdvancementMD36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Advancement · American Policy Coalition · Government Integrity Fund · The Revitalization Project · A Public Voice Inc · American Jobs and Security · American Exceptionalism Institute · Citizens for a Working America Inc · Safe Streets Safe Communities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prosperity Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prosperity Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Prosperity Alliance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Prosperity Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prosperity Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph