Skip to content

· Public charity

Project Vetrelief Inc

Project vetrelief is providing assistance to united states military veterans and familes for food, housing and education.

$388k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$73kReligion$46kAnimals$44kHuman Services$43kPublic Benefit$24kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $186,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $388,096 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $202,096 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
$16,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$929k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOF MISSIONS$26,000
THE GREY TEAM$26,000
K9LINE$24,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
MOTHERS OF VETERAN SUICIDE$16,000
IGY6 FOUNDATION$16,000
VETERANS COUNSELING VETERANS$16,000
PAINT 22$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM: $8k → 9%DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 11 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$306k
$8k

Still filing today

36%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
AnimalsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOF MISSIONS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $46k
  • GT
    Grey Team Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue 0%
  • KI
    K9Line Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $44k · revenue -10% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
0/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOF MISSIONS: $45,500 · OtherSOF MISSIONSGrey Team Inc: $45,000 · OtherGrey Team IncIGY6 FOUNDATION: $28,500 · OtherIGY6 FOUNDATIONVETERANS COUNSELING VETERANS INC: $28,000 · OtherVETERANS COUNSELING VETERANS INCIndividual grant recipient: $26,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPAINT22 INC: $14,000 · OtherPAINT22 INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherK9Line Inc: $43,500 · AnimalsK9Line IncMOTHERS OF VETERAN SUICIDE CORP: $23,500 · Public BenefitDEFENDERS OF FREEDOM - FL INC: $14,000 · Human Services
Other$233,000Animals$43,500Public Benefit$23,500Human Services$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGrey Team Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetK9Line Inc: $43,500 over 2y, 27% of budgetMOTHERS OF VETERAN SUICIDE CORP: $23,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetDEFENDERS OF FREEDOM - FL INC: $14,000 over 2y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Grey Team Inc ↗
  • Who funds K9Line Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS OF VETERAN SUICIDE CORP ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM - FL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project Vetrelief Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Vetrelief Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Project Vetrelief Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Project Vetrelief Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Project Vetrelief’s filings →

    More from the funding graph