Skip to content

· Public charity

Project South Inc

Project souths mission is to build the foundation for successful broad-based social justice movements.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$497k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$4.8MEnvironment$1.9MCivil Rights$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.5MArts & Culture$821kEducation$352kHuman Services$299kFood & Nutrition$287kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,104,660, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,327,679 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $223,019 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $166k
  • $250k+2 grants · $902k
$165,967
Median grant
4
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A LAWSON CONSULTING$497,313
THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRAN$405,000
CRESENT CITY MEDIA GROUP$165,967
HUNGER COALITION ATLANTA LLC$12,900
METROPOLITAN CHRISTIAN COUNCIL PHILA$12,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS CDO$11,480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $31k → 33%OPERATION SHOESTRING: $40k → 23%THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $25k → 33%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
PA
RI
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 12 repeat orgs$9.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
32

Total granted

$8.5M
$8.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+1%

Still filing today

8%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GULF COAST CENTER FOR LAW
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4.6M
  • IA
    IMMIGRATION ALLIANCE FOR JUST
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M
  • IW
    IMAGINE WATER WORKS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M

Funded once

  • G
    GS4GND
    one grant, 2022 · $4.8M
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POWER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $815k
  • AL
    A LAWSON CONSULTING
    one grant, 2023 · $497k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
2
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
3
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
4
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
5
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
6
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
7
Alliance for Justice

Alliance for justice builds the strength of progressive movements by training and educating nonprofit organizations on advocacy, while harnessing their collective power to transform our state and federal courts.

Civil Rights
8
Climate Rights International

CRI is an international climate and human rights monitoring and advocacy organization dedicated to preventing climate change and human rights abuses.

Environment
9
Just Strategy

Just Strategy builds powerful issue campaigns that win. We educate organizers and movement leaders. We help develop effective strategies for racial and economic justice movements. We create innovative organizing projects where we see a…

Civil Rights
10
Queer Power Alliance

Queer Power Alliance is rooted in the LGBTQIA+ community and in solidarity with other marginalized communities. We strive for equity by disrupting systems of oppression holding back LGBTQIA+ communities through advocating, educating,…

Human Services
11
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
12
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Steps Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Women Watch Afrika. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GS4GND: $4,750,376 · OtherGS4GNDGULF COAST CENTER FOR LAW: $4,576,149 · OtherGULF COAST CENTER FOR LAWIMMIGRATION ALLIANCE FOR JUST: $1,069,872 · OtherIMMIGRATION ALLIANCE FOR JUSTIMAGINE WATER WORKS: $1,029,859 · OtherIMAGINE WATER WORKSSOUTHERN POWER FUND: $815,000 · OtherA LAWSON CONSULTING: $699,660 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $608,337 · Other+31 more: $3,852,791 · Other+31 moreCOMMUNITY JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $270,000 · Civil RightsCenter For Fair Housing Inc: $15,000 · Civil RightsCATALYST MIAMI INC: $150,250 · Community ImprovementSTEPS COALITION: $150,250 · EducationTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $56,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION SHOESTRING INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $6,600 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE ENERGY: $72,108 · Environment
Other$17,402,044Civil Rights$285,000Community Improvement$150,250Education$150,250Human Services$102,600Environment$72,108

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $405,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $270,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCATALYST MIAMI INC: $150,250 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSTEPS COALITION: $150,250 over 1y, 22% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE ENERGY: $72,108 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $56,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCenter For Fair Housing Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetKINDRED INC: $14,950 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $6,600 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY JUSTICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SHOESTRING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project South Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project South Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Project South Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Project South Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Project South’s filings →

    More from the funding graph