Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$15MHousing & Shelter$12MEducation$2.4MEmployment$1.1MHealth$1.0MFood & Nutrition$743kHuman Services$731kCommunity Improvement$386kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.9M
$2,886,059
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL COMMUNITIES INC$2,886,059
AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH$19,172
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $174k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BCFS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $33k → 16%Society of St Vincent de Paul: $10k → 17%PROMUNDO: $58k → 14%BCFS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $13k → 16%PROMUNDO: $39k → 14%BCFS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $6k → 16%United Women of East Africa Support Team (UWEAST): $10k → 11%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA SUPPORT TEAM (UWEAST): $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 22 repeat orgs$813k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$32M
$794k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+26%

Still filing today

73%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GLOBAL COMMUNITIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $24M · revenue +23%
  • 3G
    3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +397% · 27% of their budget
  • ID
    INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • GG
    GAPPS Global Alliance To Prevent Prematurity And Stillbirth
    one grant, 2019 · $386k · revenue -76% · 35% of their budget
  • TP
    THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $191k · revenue -35%
  • LC
    LA CLINICA DE FAMILIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $34k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
4
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
5
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
11
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
Asante Physician Partners

Asante physician partners is a multi-specialty provider group, with approximately 400 providers, that is headquartered in medford, oregon, and has 25 clinic locations in southern oregon. asante physician partners was established for the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Center for Research On Women and the most unlike its peers is Burundi Friends International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr16%85%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,812

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $24,406,656 · InternationalGLOBAL COMMUNITIESINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES — $1,055,812 · International+4 more — $926,751 · InternationalJUAREZ & ASSOCIATES — $1,581,050 · OtherJUAREZ & ASS…CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $742,929 · OtherCATHOLIC REL…TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $651,353 · OtherTRUSTEES OF …DALBERG — $420,149 · OtherDALBERG+9 more — $259,872 · Other+9 more3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $1,069,380 · EmploymentSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $420,334 · HealthINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $147,428 · HealthMARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $95,532 · HealthLA CLINICA DE FAMILIA INC — $34,148 · Health+4 more — $27,796 · HealthGAPPS Global Alliance To Prevent Prematurity And Stillbirth — $385,883 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES — $333,309 · Community ImprovementPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $501,809 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 · EducationFordham University — $33,725 · EducationSCHOOL-TO-SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL — $24,305 · EducationEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $96,936 · Human ServicesBCFS Health and Human Services — $52,198 · Human ServicesUnited Women of East Africa Support Team — $15,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SACRED HEART CONFERENCE — $10,000 · Human Services
International$26,389,219Other$3,655,353Employment$1,069,380Health$725,238Community Improvement$719,192Education$609,839Human Services$174,134

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $24,406,656 over 4y, 5.9% of budget3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $1,069,380 over 4y, 27% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES — $1,055,812 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $669,929 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $501,809 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $420,334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGAPPS Global Alliance To Prevent Prematurity And Stillbirth — $385,883 over 1y, 35% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES — $333,309 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $191,207 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $147,428 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $96,936 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $95,532 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDepositing Empowerment Through Outreach and Urban — $57,750 over 2y, 13% of budgetBCFS Health and Human Services — $52,198 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN — $43,961 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLA CLINICA DE FAMILIA INC — $34,148 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University — $33,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition — $28,750 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSCHOOL-TO-SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL — $24,305 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBurundi Friends International — $24,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSeeds For Progress Foundation Inc — $21,654 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES — $19,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SACRED HEART CONFERENCE — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetUnited Medical Centers — $9,796 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Family Care — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…Global CommunitiesFamily Health Interna…Price Philanthropies …California Healthcare…Gates FoundationJohns Hopkins Univers…Jhpiego CorporationDavid C Copley Founda…The Conrad Prebys Fou…Jewish Community Foun…The David and Lucile …
The San Diego FoundationCA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Global Communities · Family Health International Inc · Price Philanthropies Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Gates Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Jhpiego Corporation · David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Project Concern International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Global Communities — 44% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines