Skip to content
Project Care of Texas Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Project Care of Texas Inc

To provide financial assistance to meet the emergency energy-related needs of elderly persons, as well as physically or mentally disabled persons, residing within the texas service territory of egsi, a large investor-owned public utiltiy company.

$503k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.1MHuman Services$854kEnvironment$119k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $266k
$25,972
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOME OTHER PLACE$133,353
UNITED BOARD OF MISSIONS$66,850
MONTGOMERY CO EMER ASSISTANCE$65,500
FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS$36,669
CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$32,015
GOOD SHEPHERD MISSION$31,872
SPIRIT OF SHARING$25,972
UNITED WAY OF HARDIN COUNTY$25,554
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$23,171
COVENANT WITH CHRIST$20,909
COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CARE-PRAY$17,290
SON-SHINE CENTER$15,781
TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION$8,440
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTGOMERY CO EMER ASSISTANCE: $118k → 9%FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $62k → 14%SON-SHINE CENTER: $20k → 17%COVENANT WITH CHRIST: $30k → 17%TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $8k → 18%SOME OTHER PLACE: $155k → 19%SPIRIT OF SHARING: $26k → 20%MONTGOMERY CO EMER ASSISTANCE: $82k → 9%FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $40k → 14%SON-SHINE CENTER: $16k → 17%COVENANT WITH CHRIST: $21k → 17%TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $6k → 18%SOME OTHER PLACE: $141k → 19%SPIRIT OF SHARING: $26k → 20%MONTGOMERY CO EMER ASSISTANCE: $71k → 9%FREINDS HELPING FREINDS: $38k → 14%SON-SHINE CENTER: $16k → 17%COVENANT WITH CHRIST: $20k → 17%SOME OTHER PLACE: $133k → 19%SPIRIT OF SHARING: $26k → 20%MONTGOMERY CO EMER ASSISTANCE: $66k → 9%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $32k → 13%FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $37k → 14%SON-SHINE CENTER: $14k → 17%COVENANT WITH CHRIST: $19k → 17%SOME OTHER PLACE: $70k → 19%SPIRIT OF SHARING: $20k → 20%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $32k → 13%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CARE-PRAY: $39k → 19%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $31k → 13%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CARE-PRAY: $18k → 19%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $28k → 13%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CARE-PRAY: $17k → 19%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CARE-PRAY: $17k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$2.0M
$0

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN SERVICES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $329k · revenue +5%
  • FH
    FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS AND BENEFIT THRIFT SHOP
    4× · 2021–2024 · $176k · revenue +2% · 84% of their budget
  • SO
    SPIRIT OF SHARING INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $98k · revenue +31%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Lamar Area Christian Ministries Association

    Benevolence to community families

    —
    2
    The Samaritan Center Inc

    To meet the basic physical, spiritual, and social need of people in our area using the ministry of Jesus as a model.

    Religion
    3
    Christian Community Ministries of Kershaw County

    Christian Community Ministries is a financial crisis ministry helping those who fall within our definition of crisis. Except for one paid administrator, we are a totally volunteer organization. We operate as an extension of the servant…

    Religion
    4
    Grace Resource Center Inc

    To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

    Housing & Shelter
    5
    Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County

    We provide financial and spiritual aid to the underprivileged, including rent and utility assistance, food, clothing, household items so they can meet their financial obligations caused by unexpected circumstances. We served over 46 people…

    —
    6
    Smith County Help Center Inc

    Assist residents and transients of Smith County with basic needs, including food, clothing, and emergency utility assistance

    Human Services
    7
    Care Share Mission of San Jacinto County Inc

    Food Pantry. Supplying food, hygiene item and household supplies to needy in our area.

    —
    8
    Christian Care

    Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

    Housing & Shelter
    9
    Katy Christian Ministries

    See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…

    Human Services
    10
    Community for Christ Outreach

    Religious Orginazation

    Housing & Shelter
    11
    Gifts From God Ministry

    Hope And Help Center. Hope by teaching the Bible, focusing on Jesus Christ. Help by working with community partners to provide services to our members and community residents.

    —
    12
    Seven Stars Christian Church

    Mission Church

    Religion
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spirit of Sharing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Community Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    4/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Some Other Place: $499,551 · Human ServicesSome Other PlaceCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center: $336,323 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance CenterCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $328,954 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN SERVICESFRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS AND BENEFIT THRIFT SHOP: $176,062 · Human ServicesFRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS AND BENEFIT THRIFT SHOPHARDIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $124,249 · Human ServicesHARDIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN CARE CENTERSPIRIT OF SHARING INC: $97,640 · Human ServicesSPIRIT OF SHARING INCCovenant with Christ International Inc: $89,735 · Human ServicesSON-SHINE OUTREACH CENTER INC: $65,285 · Human Services+1 more: $14,939 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD MISSION: $107,761 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD MIS…Society of St Vincent de Paul Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston: $102,629 · OtherSociety of St Vin…UNITED APPEALS OF HARDIN COUNTY: $75,314 · OtherUNITED APPEALS OF…DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF BEAUMONT SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $29,119 · OtherDIOCESAN COUNCIL …
    Human Services$1,732,738Other$314,823

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSome Other Place: $499,551 over 4y, 10% of budgetCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center: $336,323 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $328,954 over 4y, 13% of budgetFRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS AND BENEFIT THRIFT SHOP: $176,062 over 4y, 84% of budgetHARDIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $124,249 over 4y, 27% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD MISSION: $107,761 over 4y, 12% of budgetSociety of St Vincent de Paul Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston: $102,629 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPIRIT OF SHARING INC: $97,640 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCovenant with Christ International Inc: $89,735 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetSON-SHINE OUTREACH CENTER INC: $65,285 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $14,939 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Houston Food BankGreater Houston Commu…Charities Aid Foundat…Amazonsmile Foundation
    The Houston Food BankTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Houston Food Bank · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Project Care of Texas Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Care of Texas Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Project Care of Texas’ filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home