How much did PROGRESS ARIZONA grant in FY2024?

PROGRESS ARIZONA reported 5 grants totaling $475,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is PROGRESS ARIZONA based?

PROGRESS ARIZONA is based in AZ.

PROGRESS ARIZONA

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

PROGRESS ARIZONA

PROGRESS ARIZONA is an organization founded in 2018 for the purpose of educating the public about key policy issues using digital organiziing and communications.

$475k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$200k

Largest

01What you fund

0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Civil Rights$968kInternational$380kCommunity Improvement$230kHuman Services$189kPublic Benefit$103kPhilanthropy$7kOther$948k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

nonpartisan gotvnonpartisan regadvocacyleadershipengagementcivic participation

2021

justiceachievegovernmentruralboardssocialadvocacy

2022

political power

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$50k–250k4 grants · $450k

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$459k

Total assets

Largest grants

WORKER POWER INSITUTE$200,000
LIVING UNITED BY CHANGE$100,000
OUR VOICE OUR VOTE$100,000
RURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT$50,000
ARIZONA STUDENTS ASSOCIATION$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$721k · 5 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +256% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$721k

$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+256%

+23%

Still filing today

80%

76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WP
WORKER POWER INSITUTE
2× · 2021–2024 · $230k · revenue +253%
OV
Our Voice Our Vote
3× · 2020–2024 · $190k · revenue +51%
L
LUCHA
3× · 2020–2024 · $181k · revenue +256%

Funded once

PA
ProgressNow AZ Federal
one grant, 2020 · $741k
PA
PROGRESSNOW AZ INSTITUTEgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $380k · revenue +325% · 69% of their budget
AA
ADRC Actiongraduated
one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arizona Latin-American

Unclassified

Solutions for an Independent Arizona

Organization mission solutions for an independent arizona envisions an arizona addresses its most pressing issues. independent arizona will identify, unite, and engage voters who want to elect people who will find common ground to serve…

Civil Rights

Center for Arizona Policy Inc

Center for arizona policy, inc.'s primary exempt purpose is to promote and defend public policy

Education

Opportunity Arizona

Opportunity arizona is an issue advocacy organization whose mission is to grow more opportunities and improve the quality of life for hard-working arizonans.

Civil Rights

Arizona Prosperity Alliance

The organization engaged in public policy advocacy, survey work, and voter education, and in the past has also provided grants to non-profit organizations with complementary missions.

—

Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting

AZCIR holds powerful people and institutions accountable by exposing injustice and systemic inequities through investigative journalism.

Arts & Culture

Rural Arizona Engagement

Raze mission is to educate, advocate and coordinate in rural communities so they may gain access to civic education, engagement opportunities and voter registration. continued on schedule o

Civil Rights

Arizona Latino Leaders in Education

We exist to ensure that individuals from the communities most impacted by education inequities are the ones making decisions for all students

Education

Poder

Our mission is to create a future in Arizona where individuals and communities historically excluded from opportunity can thrive, lead, and shape the direction of their lives and their state, free from systemic barriers and limitation.

Civil Rights

Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health

Arizona Coalition for Change

Arizona coalition for change is committed to empowering communities through leadership development, civic engagement, and advocacy. continued on schedule o.

Civil Rights

Progress Arizona

Progress arizona is an organization founded in 2018 for the purpose of educating the public about key policy issues using digital organizi

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advancing Az and the most unlike its peers is Tides Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/20

Grantees still filing

13/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Civil Rights$968,200Other$947,774International$380,000Community Improvement$230,000Human Services$189,000Public Benefit$103,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Foundation · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Grove Action Fund · Public Wise Inc · New Venture Fund · America Votes · Tides Advocacy · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Organize Action · Women Donors Network Action · Proteus Action League

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PROGRESS ARIZONA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROGRESSNOW AZ INSTITUTE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833494676 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PROGRESSNOW AZ INSTITUTE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 69% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Progress Arizona?

Find your warmest path to Progress Arizona through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PROGRESS ARIZONA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Progress Arizona?

More from the funding graph

PROGRESS ARIZONA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Progress Arizona?

More from the funding graph