Skip to content
Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc

The mission of the professional fire fighters of wisconsin charitable foundation is to champion community risk reduction initiatives; promote fire safety and prevention; and deliver meaningful support to burn survivors, fire fighters and communities.

$333k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$257kEducation$190kPublic Safety & Disaster$72kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $95,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $332,683 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $237,683 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$95,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$872k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$95,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE L021 BROOKFIELD: $14k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $95k → 10%DANE COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $11k → 11%INTL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL 1440: $11k → 17%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE L021 BROOKFIELD: $13k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $95k → 10%ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $21k → 17%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $6k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $69k → 10%MILWAUKEE PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215 AFL-CIO: $5k → 17%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $45k → 10%WEST ALLIS FIREFIGHTERS CHARITES INC: $5k → 17%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $37k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $32k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $20k → 10%LOCAL 311 CHARITIES: $12k → 10%LOCAL 311 CHARITIES: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 5 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$474k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $202k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +39%
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue -45%

Funded once

  • AW
    ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +15%
  • IA
    INTL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 1440
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +8%
  • DC
    DUNN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $201,960 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITYINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS BROOKFIELD LOCAL 2051: $26,700 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS BROOKFIELD LOC…INTL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 1440: $11,400 · OtherDUNN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $11,125 · Other+2 more: $10,549 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $190,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONLOCAL 311 CHARITIES INC: $21,750 · PhilanthropyLOCAL 311…ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,935 · PhilanthropyASCENSION…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $33,750 · Health
Other$261,734Education$190,000Philanthropy$42,685Health$33,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $33,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS BROOKFIELD LOCAL 2051: $26,700 over 2y, 19% of budgetLOCAL 311 CHARITIES INC: $21,750 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,935 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 1440: $11,400 over 1y, 12% of budgetMILWAUKEE PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL NO 215 MILWAUKEE: $5,434 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home