Skip to content

California · Public charity

PRO Youth and Families

The Organization is a nonprofit serving the Greater Sacramento area. The Organization partners with schools, community organizations, and local governments to engage youth in opportunities that inspire hope. Organizations programs encompass leadership, advocacy, civic engagement, mentoring, relationship skills, work-based learning,…

$2.3M
Granted FY2021
16
Itemized grants FY2021
16
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2021
$863k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$53,453
Largest grant, FY2021
$116,900
States reached, FY2021
2
Total assets, FY2021
$2.1M
62% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$269kArts & Culture$218kYouth Development$111kFood & Nutrition$72kRecreation & Sports$69kCommunity Improvement$60kPhilanthropy$48kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Roberts Family Development Center$105,80113%
Heal and Rebuild Collective$73,7501n/a
Feed Sacramento Homeless$71,5501n/a
Academics 4 Athletes$68,650134%
The Sacramento Chinese Community$60,0001n/a
National Academic Youth Corps Inc$54,250118%
SistaBees$53,4531n/a
Hmong Youth and Parents United$52,65815%
Bridge Network Corp$50,500134%
Save Family Foundation$48,4001n/a
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of PRO Youth and Families by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Roberts Family Development Center$105,80113%
Heal and Rebuild Collective$73,7501n/a
Feed Sacramento Homeless$71,5501n/a
Academics 4 Athletes$68,650134%
The Sacramento Chinese Community$60,0001n/a
National Academic Youth Corps Inc$54,250118%
SistaBees$53,4531n/a
Hmong Youth and Parents United$52,65815%
Bridge Network Corp$50,500134%
Save Family Foundation$48,4001n/a
Unsung Heroes Living History Project$47,220156%
iFoster Inc$24,00011%
The Folsom Cordova Community Partnership$13,00010%
Fitrah Inc$7,5001n/a

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($132k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

PRO Youth and Families supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRoberts Family Development Center: $105,801 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAcademics 4 Athletes: $68,650 over 1y, 34% of budgetNational Academic Youth Corps Inc: $54,250 over 1y, 18% of budgetHmong Youth and Parents United: $52,658 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBridge Network Corp: $50,500 over 1y, 34% of budgetUnsung Heroes Living History Project: $47,220 over 1y, 56% of budgetiFoster Inc: $24,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Folsom Cordova Community Partnership: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program ManagementCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare PRO Youth and Families with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to PRO Youth and Families?

Find your warmest path to PRO Youth and Families through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About PRO Youth and Families

How much does PRO Youth and Families give?
PRO Youth and Families reported 16 itemized grants totaling $862,532, out of $2,302,120 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does PRO Youth and Families fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2021, its largest causes are Human Services (3%), Arts & Culture (2%), Youth Development (1%).
Who are PRO Youth and Families's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2021: Roberts Family Development Center ($106k), Heal and Rebuild Collective ($74k), Feed Sacramento Homeless ($72k).
Which funders back the same organizations as PRO Youth and Families?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is PRO Youth and Families based?
PRO Youth and Families is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PRO Youth and Families’ filings →

More from the funding graph