Skip to content

· Public charity

Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and tourism in prineville and crook county oregon.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$972kRecreation & Sports$67kCrime & Legal$33kPhilanthropy$26kEducation$25kHuman Services$21kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $68,875, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,675 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$68,875
Median grant
1
States reached
$945k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROOK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C$68,875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PRINEVILLE SENIOR CTR CHARITABLE TR: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$846k · 4 repeat orgs$320k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
18

Total granted

$846k
$251k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-38%
0%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce
    6× · 2017–2022 · $550k · revenue +16%
  • PD
    PRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $175k · 44% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF PRINEVILLE
    5× · 2018–2025 · $95k

Funded once

  • PC
    PROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · 62% of their budget
  • CC
    Crook County Parks & Recreation Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue -72%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crook County Education Foundation

To solicit, receive, and manage funds for the purpose of furthering educational activities in schools and other organizations in Crook County.

Education
2
Colville Main Street

Maintain and Preserve Downtown Colville

Community Improvement
3
Deschutes County Historical Society

Preserve, promote and celebrate our local history

—
4
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
5
Benton City Revitalization Organization
Community Improvement
6
Harney County Chamber of Commerce

Promoting Tourism and Economic Growth

—
7
Colville Now

Promote Colville Community, restarting activity in 2025-2026

Community Improvement
8
Pendleton Downtown Association

Develop partnerships to stimulate economic vitality and investments in the downtown core, generate a positive image and promote tourism while celebrating our Western Heritage.

Community Improvement
9
Oregon Cascades West Senior Services Foundation

To provide Assistance to Senior Citizen Programs

Human Services
10
Crook County Museum District

Encourage, promote, correlate and cooperate in research, exhibition, and display of historical items in crook county wyoming

Arts & Culture
11
Earth Day Oregon
—
12
Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crook County Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Prineville Downtown Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce: $549,773 · OtherPrineville-Crook Co Chamber of CommerceCITY OF PRINEVILLE: $95,000 · OtherCITY OF PRINEVILLECrook County Parks & Recreation Foundation: $36,320 · Other+14 more: $126,755 · Other+14 morePRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION: $175,000 · Community ImprovementPRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATIONPROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUB: $75,000 · Community ImprovementPROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUBCROOK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C: $68,875 · Community ImprovementCROOK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPME…+1 more: $7,800 · Community ImprovementPRINEVILLE KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $25,825 · PhilanthropyPRINEVILLE SENIOR CENTER CHARITABLE TRUST: $5,560 · Human Services
Other$807,848Community Improvement$326,675Philanthropy$25,825Human Services$5,560

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce: $549,773 over 6y, 19% of budgetPRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION: $175,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetPROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUB: $75,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetCROOK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C: $68,875 over 1y, 34% of budgetCrook County Parks & Recreation Foundation: $36,320 over 1y, 22% of budgetPRINEVILLE KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $25,825 over 2y, 11% of budgetCROOK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION: $7,800 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPRINEVILLE SENIOR CENTER CHARITABLE TRUST: $5,560 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds PRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CROOK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C ↗
  • Who funds Crook County Parks & Recreation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PRINEVILLE KIWANIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROOK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRINEVILLE SENIOR CENTER CHARITABLE TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce: 28% of income from government
  • Crook County Historical Society: 28% of income from government
  • Crook County Foundation: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce’s filings →

More from the funding graph