Loading…
· Public charity
Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce
To promote business and tourism in prineville and crook county oregon.
$87k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
economic
2023
beautification
2024
beautification
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$25,000
- CITY OF PRINEVILLE$25,000
- 1868 PROPERTIES LLC$8,000
- CROOK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,000
- RITCHES LLC dba THE POSIE SHOPPE$8,000
- BAYBERRY LANE$7,110
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$760k · 4 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
13
Total granted
$760k
$195k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-38%
+11%
Still filing today
50%
23%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EDECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENT OREG5× · 2018–2022 · $464k · revenue +76%
- PDPRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION2× · 2022–2023 · $175k · 44% of their budget
- COCITY OF PRINEVILLE4× · 2018–2024 · $95k
Funded once
- PCPROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUBone grant, 2022 · $75k · 62% of their budget
- CCCROOK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION FDNone grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue -48%
- CVCHRISTMAS VALLEY PARK AND REC DISTone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Clark County Historical Society
To preserve historical resources useful to the understanding of the heritage of clark county.
Arts & Culture
2
Crook County Education Foundation
To solicit, receive, and manage funds for the purpose of furthering educational activities in schools and other organizations in Crook County.
Education
3
Deschutes County Historical Society
Preserve promote and celebrate our local history
—
4
Palouse Community Center
The Palouse Community Center strives to enrich the lives of Palouse and surrounding area citizens by reinforcing a sense of community, providing an opportunity for all ages to interact, and enabling people to share their perspectives,…
—
5
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
6
Polk County Historical Society
The purpose of the polk county historical society is to encourage the study, knowledge and understanding of the history of polk county.
—
7
Oregon Historical Society
The oregon historical society has been collecting, preserving, exhibiting and publishing oregon's history for over 100 years. today, the society's complex is a landmark in the heart of portland's cultural district, and offers oregon's rich…
Arts & Culture
8
Community Foundation for Sw Washington
The foundation is a charitable granting organization whose mission is to inspire a culture of giving to create a vibrant and engaged community.
Philanthropy
9
Crockett County Historical Scientific
Maintain crockett county museum
Arts & Culture
10
Oregon Cascades West Senior Services Foundation
To provide Assistance to Senior Citizen Programs
Human Services
11
The Oregon Community Foundation Trust
The oregon community foundation trust is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf). the trust makes grants that further the mission of ocf which is to improve lives for all oregonians through the power of…
Philanthropy
12
Presque Isle Community Development Association
To promote and encourage economic development, revitalization and growth in a manner that is conducive to quality of life.
Community Improvement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crook County Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Prineville Downtown Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$722,075Community Improvement$257,800Philanthropy$25,825Human Services$5,560
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENT OREG ↗
- Who funds PRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PROSPECT COMMUNITY CLUB ↗
- Who funds CROOK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION FDN ↗
- Who funds PRINEVILLE KIWANIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROOK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRINEVILLE SENIOR CTR CHARITABLE TR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Oregon Community FoundationOR15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 833597161 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PRINEVILLE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce?
Find your warmest path to Prineville-Crook Co Chamber of Commerce through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines