Skip to content

· Private foundation

Primemls Cares Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$47kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
JEREY AND LISA SPIESS$6,081
Individual grant recipient$5,925
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC$5,000
EL PEZ DORADO RESTURANT LLC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,832
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,392
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Cathedral Soup Kitchen Inc

The Cathedral Soup Kitchen, Inc.'s mission is to help people out of food insecurity and champion their pursuit of stability and prosperity. Our vision is hope, success, and abundance for people in need in Camden. The organization serves a…

Human Services
2
Claremont Soup Kitchen

Claremont soup kitchen is a non profit community agency committed to serving individuals and families needing food assistance in the sullivan county area. we provide food & other available products to those in need. we serve breakfast &…

Food & Nutrition
3
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
4
Shepherd's Table Soup Kitchen Inc

To help feed those who are in need, without regard to age, race, sex, religion, or national origin.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Soup Kitchen of Goldsboro Inc

To provide nutritional meals to individuals in need in wayne county area.

Food & Nutrition
6
Siouxland Community Soup Kitchen

The purpose of the corporation is to provide food and meals to those in need.

—
7
The Shoreline Soup Kitchens & Pantries Inc

The shoreline soup kitchens & pantries is an interfaith service that provides food and fellowship to those in need and educates the community on hunger and poverty.

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Kitchen Inc

Provide food and service referrals

Food & Nutrition
9
Western South Dakota Senior Services Inc

To assist seniors in maintaining optimal health, independence, and socialization, deferring admission to long term care facilities and improving their quality of life.

—
10
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
11
Sky Valley Food Bank

To provide supplemental food to those in need, preserving the dignity of those we help.

—
12
The Giving Plate

Feeding the hungry today with compassion and hospitality

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Morrisville Youth Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTANGLEWOOD PARK COOPERATIVE: $10,000 · OtherTANGLEWOOD PARK COOPERATIVEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherSUSAN AND RALPH BARRETT: $6,575 · OtherJEREY AND LISA SPIESS: $6,081 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+26 more: $69,340 · Other+26 moreANEW PLACE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHEARTS FOR KINDNESS: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING TINY TUMMIES: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMORRISVILLE YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$178,996Housing & Shelter$15,000Human Services$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Recreation & Sports$2,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANEW PLACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHEARTS FOR KINDNESS: $5,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING TINY TUMMIES: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMORRISVILLE YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSONSHINE SOUP KITCHEN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANEW PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS FOR KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING TINY TUMMIES ↗
  • Who funds MORRISVILLE YOUTH SOCCER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SONSHINE SOUP KITCHEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Primemls Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Primemls Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Primemls Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Primemls Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Primemls Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph