Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Prime Health Foundation 10026400

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$278kHealth$234kCrime & Legal$151kEducation$96kCommunity Improvement$83kYouth Development$63kEmployment$62kFood & Nutrition$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lyrik's Institution$40,000
Village Initiative$40,000
Youth Guidance$40,000
MATTIE RHODES CENTER$40,000
AD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME$25,000
CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WELCOME HOUSE INC: $15k → 17%AD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME: $35k → 15%AD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME: $25k → 15%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $20k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $8k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%ADHOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME: $19k → 15%ADHOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME: $17k → 15%ADHOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME: $15k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $15k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $15k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $8k → 15%TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$613k · 17 repeat orgs$491k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
37

Total granted

$613k
$411k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

94%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $131k · revenue +49%
  • AH
    AD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME
    5× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +150%
  • CT
    CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS
    3× · 2021–2025 · $62k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • TM
    TOTAL MAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • UR
    URBAN RANGER CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • KC
    KC CARE CLINIC
    one grant, 2021 · $29k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
2
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
3
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
4
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
5
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
6
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
7
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
8
Cross-Lines Community Outreach Inc

To provide people in the Kansas City area affected by poverty with services and opportunities that encourage self-confidence, meet the needs of today, and provide the tools for future self-sufficiency.

Human Services
9
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
10
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Opportunities Inc of Jefferson County

Opportunities, inc. of jefferson county provides services for individuals for the purpose of maximizing their success and enhancing their abilities to be independent, contributing members of the community.

—
12
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mattie Rhodes Memorial Society D/B/a Mattie Rhodes Center and the most unlike its peers is Lyriks Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr12%9%5–10yr15%17%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr11%34%35–55yr29%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%10%5–10yr15%19%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr29%23%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
790/5,986

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOTAL MAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $40,000 · OtherTOTAL MAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPURBAN RANGER CORP — $40,000 · OtherURBAN RANGER CORPKC CARE CLINIC — $29,297 · OtherKC CARE CLINICAFTER THE HARVEST — $20,350 · OtherMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY — $20,000 · OtherRosedale Development Association — $20,000 · OtherRediscover — $20,000 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $20,000 · OtherHEALTH OUTREACH FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+25 more — $180,933 · Other+25 moreMATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER — $130,500 · HealthMATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOC…LYRIKS INSTITUTION — $40,000 · HealthLYRIKS INSTITUTIONCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUN…Amethyst Place Inc — $18,000 · HealthAmethyst Place IncNorthland Health Care Access — $15,000 · HealthNorthland Health Care Acce…MERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC — $12,000 · HealthSAVING KIDSIGHT — $10,000 · HealthTRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthAD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME — $110,500 · Human ServicesAD HOC GROUP AGAINST …UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC — $38,000 · Human ServicesUNITED INNER CITY SER…CORNERSTONES OF CARE — $20,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES OF CAREYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $17,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN…WELCOME HOUSE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesWELCOME HOUSE INCTrue Light Family Resource Center — $10,000 · Human ServicesYouth Guidance — $45,000 · EducationYouth Guid…ARTSTECH — $37,500 · EducationARTSTECHOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $15,000 · EducationOPERATION …CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS — $61,500 · EmploymentTHE VILLAGE INITIATIVE — $40,000 · Crime & LegalEL CENTRO INC — $23,000 · Community ImprovementURBAN SCHOLASTIC CENTER — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$405,580Health$260,500Human Services$211,000Education$97,500Employment$61,500Crime & Legal$40,000Community Improvement$28,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER — $130,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAD HOC GROUP AGAINST CRIME — $110,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS — $61,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYouth Guidance — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC — $38,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetARTSTECH — $37,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetEL CENTRO INC — $23,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAFTER THE HARVEST — $20,350 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRosedale Development Association — $20,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetRediscover — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAmethyst Place Inc — $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH OUTREACH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetNorthland Health Care Access — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWELCOME HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHLAND SHEPHERD'S CENTER — $12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEARTLAND OUTREACH PROVIDERS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSAVING KIDSIGHT — $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrue Light Family Resource Center — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER OF REFUGE — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN RANGER CORPS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN SCHOLASTIC CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEVELUP KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRESTART INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Health Forward Founda…Greater Kansas City C…United Way of Greater…Oppenstein Brothers F…The H & R Block Found…Ewing Marion Kauffman…Menorah Heritage Foun…The Sunderland Founda…Jackson County Commun…William T Kemper Foun…R a Long Foundation 6…The Shumaker Family F…
Health Forward FoundationMO58.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · The Shumaker Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Prime Health Foundation 10026400 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines