Skip to content

· Public charity

Prevent Child Abuse Delaware Inc

As the leader in child abuse prevention activities in delaware, the organization provides for an understanding of child abuse and its solutions, serves as a resource for individuals, families and communities, and advocates for enhances prevention policies and programs.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$220kPhilanthropy$211kPublic Benefit$90kEducation$74kCrime & Legal$71kHealth$33kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$12k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $161k
$14,890
Median grant
1
States reached
$878k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE STATE OF DELAWARE$90,260
CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST$70,618
JAY'S HOUSE$14,890
HILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD$12,040
DELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INC$12,000
ST MICHAELS NURSERY$5,053
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $71k → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $50k → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $50k → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $30k → 10%DELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INC: $12k → 10%HILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 78% of Prevent Child Abuse Delaware Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in DE; by stated purpose, 22%.

Prevent Child Abuse Delaware Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$491k · 4 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$491k
$101k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $211k · revenue +116%
  • CA
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST
    4× · 2021–2024 · $201k · revenue +9%
  • SO
    STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $66k

Funded once

  • RC
    RODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF DE
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • SO
    STATE OF DELAWARE CHILD DEATH NEAR DEATH AND STILLBORN COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2019 · $33k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE STATE OF DELAWARE: $90,260 · OtherTHE STATE OF DELAWARESTATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRO: $65,794 · OtherSTATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES…RODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF DE: $50,000 · OtherRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF DESTATE OF DELAWARE CHILD DEATH NEAR DEATH AND STILLBORN COMMITTEE: $33,000 · OtherSTATE OF DELAWARE CHILD DEATH NEAR DEATH AN…MILFORD EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $13,712 · Other+4 more: $23,183 · Other+4 moreCHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST: $200,614 · Human ServicesCHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRSTHILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $12,040 · Human ServicesHILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTE…DELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesDELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INCRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE: $210,705 · PhilanthropyRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DEJAYS HOUSE INC: $14,890 · Health
Other$275,949Human Services$224,654Philanthropy$210,705Health$14,890

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE: $210,705 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST: $200,614 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $12,040 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST MICHAEL'S SCHOOL AND NURSERY INC: $5,053 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST ↗
  • Who funds JAYS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP LUTHERAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE ADOLESCENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MICHAEL'S SCHOOL AND NURSERY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · Welfare Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Longwood Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prevent Child Abuse Delaware Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prevent Child Abuse Delaware Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 48%
  • Children and Families First: 87% of income from government
  • Delaware Adolescent Program Inc: 76% of income from government
  • St Michael's School and Nursery Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Hilltop Lutheran Neighborhood Center Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Rodel Charitable Foundation - De: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prevent Child Abuse Delaware’s filings →

More from the funding graph