Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Presence Health Foundation Board of Trustees

To solicit and invest contributions, gifts and bequests on the behalf of presence alexian brothers health system, so that they may develop and expand their services to the communities they serve.

$5.1M
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Health$15MEducation$471k
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $288k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.7M
$354,852
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESENCE CHICAGO HOSPITALS NETWORK$1,852,373
RAINBOW HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE$1,003,098
PRESENCE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$729,153
PRESENCE LIFE CONNECTIONS$467,038
PRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES - CHICAGOLAND$354,852
PRESENCE CENTRAL AND SUBURBAN HOSPITALS NETWORK$336,232
PRESENCE CARE TRANSFORMATION CORPORATION$175,592
PRESENCE AMBULATORY SERVICES$112,005
ARTHUR MERKLE - CLARA KNIPPRATH NURSING HOME$16,866
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESENCE CHICAGO HOSPITALS NETWORK: $3.7M → 14%PRESENCE CHICAGO HOSPITALS NETWORK: $1.9M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 7 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$14M
$695k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-62%
-17%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Presence Chicago Hospitals Network
    2× · 2017–2019 · $5.5M · revenue -51%
  • PC
    Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3.4M · revenue -76%
  • PL
    PRESENCE LIFE CONNECTIONS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1.6M · revenue -58%

Funded once

  • RU
    Resurrection University
    one grant, 2017 · $471k · revenue -17%
  • PH
    Presence Healthcare Services
    one grant, 2017 · $224k · revenue -53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ascension Health Senior Care

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
2
Providence Park Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

3
Ascension Health

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

Health
4
Ascension All Saints Hospital Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
5
Ascension Ne Wisconsin Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
6
St Vincent's Medical Center

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
7
Ministry Health Care Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

8
Providence Hospital

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
9
Ascension St Francis Hospital Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
10
Ascension Providence

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
11
Ascension St Clare's Hospital Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
12
Providence Health Alliance

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presence Ambulatory Services and the most unlike its peers is Resurrection University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
0/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network — $3,377,305 · HealthPresence Central and Suburban Hospitals NetworkPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND — $1,294,813 · HealthPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLANDPresence Behavioral Health — $1,180,302 · HealthPresence Behavioral HealthPresence Care Transformation Corporation — $582,365 · HealthPresence Care Transformation CorporationPresence Healthcare Services — $224,036 · HealthPresence Chicago Hospitals Network — $5,544,183 · Human ServicesPresence Chicago Hospitals NetworkPRESENCE LIFE CONNECTIONS — $1,591,141 · OtherPRESENCE LIFE CONNE…Rainbow Hospice and Palliative Care — $1,003,098 · OtherRainbow Hospice and…+1 more — $16,866 · OtherResurrection University — $470,701 · EducationPresence Ambulatory Services — $275,935 · Education
Health$6,658,821Human Services$5,544,183Other$2,611,105Education$746,636

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPresence Chicago Hospitals Network — $5,544,183 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPresence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network — $3,377,305 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRESENCE LIFE CONNECTIONS — $1,591,141 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND — $1,294,813 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPresence Behavioral Health — $1,180,302 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetRainbow Hospice and Palliative Care — $1,003,098 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPresence Care Transformation Corporation — $582,365 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetResurrection University — $470,701 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPresence Ambulatory Services — $275,935 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPresence Healthcare Services — $224,036 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Chicago Community TrustIL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Presence Health Foundation Board of Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph