· Public charity
Presbyterian Homes Housing & Assisted Living Inc
The mission of presbyterian homes housing & assisted living, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $5,049,999 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,208,384 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,158,385 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
- $250k+3 grants · $4.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHS WALNUT RIDGE LLC | $2,200,000 |
| PHS COUNCIL BLUFFS INC | $2,200,000 |
| PHS MARANATHA INC | $500,000 |
| SHOREVIEW SENIOR RESIDENCE | $149,999 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPHS COUNCIL BLUFFS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $15M · revenue +1% · 59% of their budget
- CRCASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER INC DBA FLAGSTONE2× · 2022–2023 · $5.5M · revenue +24% · 26% of their budget
- PGPHW GERMANTOWN INC4× · 2020–2023 · $4.5M · revenue +22% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- PHPRESBYTERIAN HOMES CARE CENTERS INCone grant, 2020 · $12M · revenue -49% · 59% of their budget
- PIPHS INTERLUDE FRIDLEY LLCone grant, 2023 · $451k
- AHALLINA HEALTH RESTORATIVE SUITESone grant, 2021 · $175k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
Provide hospice, palliative care, related therapy and services in the community, in rental housing (assisted living and independent living) and skilled nursing facilities.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of presbyterian homes of bloomington, inc. is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
To honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
The mission of the organization is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Homes Care Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allina Health Restorative Suites. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHS COUNCIL BLUFFS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES CARE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER INC DBA FLAGSTONE ↗
- Who funds PHW GERMANTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES MILL POND INC ↗
- Who funds PHS MARANATHA INC ↗
- Who funds WAYZATA BAY SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PHMNEW RICHMOND SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PHSCOTTAGE GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds PHS INTERLUDE FRIDLEY LLC ↗
- Who funds PHW OCONOMOWOC INC ↗
- Who funds CROSBY SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HUDSON SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ALLINA HEALTH RESTORATIVE SUITES ↗
- Who funds SHOREVIEW SENIOR RESIDENCE DBA SCANDIA SHORES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Presbyterian Homes Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Presbyterian Homes Housing & Assisted Living Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Presbyterian Homes Housing & Assisted Living Inc?
Find your warmest path to Presbyterian Homes Housing & Assisted Living Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.