Skip to content

· Private foundation

Potteiger Samuel

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$233kHealth$145kHuman Services$127kAnimals$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kPublic Benefit$16kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST PA SYNOD LUTH CHURCH$30,000
EVERTRUE$15,000
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$11,625
READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,875
THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING$7,500
TOWER HEALTH AT HOME$2,500
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BERKS COUNTY$2,500
CITY OF READING MAYOR$2,500
THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,500
FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $9k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $8k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $8k → 11%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $8k → 11%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $8k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF READING: $7k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $3k → 11%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $3k → 11%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $3k → 11%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $3k → 11%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $3k → 11%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$499k · 12 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$499k
$54k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $61k · revenue +40%
  • RH
    READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $58k · revenue +144%
  • TC
    The Children's Home of Reading
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • DL
    DIAKON LUTHERN SOC MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • TL
    THE LUTHERAN HOME AT TOPTON
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • RH
    READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CTR
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
2
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
3
Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center

The mission of penn state health holy spirit medical center is to nurture the healing ministry of the church, supported by education and research. fidelity to the gospel urges us to emphasize human dignity and social justice as we create…

Health
4
Tower Health Medical Group

Tower health medical group is the region's premier physician-directed, multi-specialty group of health care professionals who participate with tower health in managing population health and promoting wellness, delivering health care that…

—
5
Tower Health At Home - Pottstown

Provide health and social services appropriate to meet the needs of individuals and families at their place of residence.

—
6
Spirit Physician Services Inc

Spirit physician services, inc. supports penn state health holy spirit medical center's mission as a community health system.

—
7
Highlands Hospital

Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

Health
8
Elk Regional Health Center

Elk regional health center d/b/a penn highlands elk will be the healthcare provider of choice for our communities through a commitment to service, quality, people, finance and growth.

Health
9
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
10
DuBois Regional Medical Center

To provide the patient with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. it's the vision of the system to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality, service…

Health
11
St Peter's Health Partners

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
12
Holy Cross Health Inc

We, holy cross health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. we carry out this mission in our communities through our commitment to be the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tower Health At Home Fka Tower Health At Home - Berks; the most unlike its peers is Humane Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHEAST PA SYNOD LUTH CHURCH: $188,334 · OtherNORTHEAST PA SYNOD LUTH CHURCHDIAKON LUTHERN SOC MINISTRIES: $29,167 · OtherDIAKON LUTHERN SOC MINISTRIESCITY OF READING MAYOR: $15,695 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,695 · OtherEVERTRUE: $15,000 · OtherTHE LUTHERAN HOME AT TOPTON: $14,167 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,625 · Other+2 more: $18,605 · Other+2 moreST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK: $61,347 · HealthST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALT…READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $58,002 · HealthREADING HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…TOWER HEALTH AT HOME FKA TOWER HEALTH AT HOME - BERKS: $7,361 · HealthTOWER HEALTH AT HOME FKA…The Children's Home of Reading: $47,084 · Human ServicesThe Children's …Family Guidance Center: $15,695 · Human ServicesFamily Guidance…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,695 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST: $50,011 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN …HUMANE PENNSYLVANIA: $15,695 · Animals
Other$308,288Health$126,710Human Services$78,474Housing & Shelter$50,011Animals$15,695

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK: $61,347 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREADING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $58,002 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST: $50,011 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Home of Reading: $47,084 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFamily Guidance Center: $15,695 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE PENNSYLVANIA: $15,695 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,695 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER HEALTH AT HOME FKA TOWER HEALTH AT HOME - BERKS: $7,361 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds READING HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Home of Reading ↗
  • Who funds Family Guidance Center ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds TOWER HEALTH AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds TOWER HEALTH AT HOME FKA TOWER HEALTH AT HOME - BERKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Breidegam Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Breidegam Family Foundation · Berks County Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Potteiger Samuel funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Potteiger Samuel. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Potteiger Samuel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph