· Public charity
Portneuf Health Trust
Enhance the health of citizens throughout eastern idaho by supporting quality medical services, and through the delivery of wellness and prevention programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $2,114,189 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,206,194 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $92,005 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $172k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $575k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF POCATELLO | $1,025,571 |
| HEALTH WEST INC | $332,926 |
| PORTNEUF GREENWAY FOUNDATION | $247,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF SE IDAHO | $135,000 |
| BADGER INC | $128,656 |
| POCATELLO FREE CLINIC | $63,718 |
| BANNOCK COUNTY D6 TREATMENT | $48,016 |
| IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY | $32,000 |
| THE CENTERS OF HOPE INC | $30,003 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY | $21,310 |
| BANNOCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| BEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $10,989 |
| PORTNEUF MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| POCATELLO CHUBBUCK CHAMBER FOUNDATI | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HWHEALTH WEST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +67%
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO5× · 2020–2024 · $665k · revenue +25%
- PGPORTNEUF GREENWAY FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $594k · revenue +225% · 42% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $15k
- PHPOCATELLO HOSPITAL LLCone grant, 2022 · $15k
- EIEASTERN IDAHO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region
To unite the business community and government to create wealth, jobs, and improve the quality of life consistent with the culture and environment of the powell valley for the benefit of all citizens.
The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…
To encourage and assist in the continued development of existing business, education, and life in ketchikan.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.
To provide through local leadership economic, technical, and engineering information, and access to resources to improve theeconomies in the area.
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County
Enhance the health of citizens throughout eastern idaho by supporting quality medical services, and through the delivery of wellness and prevention programs.
Management of County's Watersheds
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Southeastern Idaho and the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Society of Addiction Medicine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTH WEST INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO ↗
- Who funds PORTNEUF GREENWAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pocatello Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds PORTNEUF VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY ↗
- Who funds POCATELLO-CHUBBUCK CHAMBER FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds POCATELLO CHUBBUCK CHAMBER OF COMME ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOSPITAL COOPERATIVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Portneuf Health Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Portneuf Health Trust?
Find your warmest path to Portneuf Health Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.