Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Population Reference Bureau Inc

PRB harnesses the power of population data to inform and advance solutions to the most urgent challenges facing our world and improve the well-being of people globally.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$1.1M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$854,183
Largest grant, FY2025
$854,183
Organizations funded a year
2 to 5
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$12M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations Population Reference Bureau Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesSocial ScienceHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$854k0%
FY20244$1.7M25%
FY20232$1.8M0%
FY20225$1.9M20%
FY20214$2.5M25%
FY20203$1.0M33%
FY20192$300k50%
FY20184$317k75%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.4MScience & Tech$4.0MEducation$3.9MHuman Services$581kInternational$382kEmployment$227kEnvironment$73kCivil Rights$20kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc$8,186,56461%
Developing Radio Partners Inc$857,379794%
The International Youth Alliance for Family Planning$845,266475%
Regents of the University of California at Berkeley$245,7883n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$173,9872n/a
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars$73,17710%
Avenir Health Inc$66,25811%
Northeastern University$22,50010%
Population Association of America Inc$20,00011%
Migration Policy Institute$20,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Population Reference Bureau Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJsi Research & Training Institute Inc: $8,186,564 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetDeveloping Radio Partners Inc: $857,379 over 7y, 94% of budgetThe International Youth Alliance for Family Planning: $845,266 over 4y, 75% of budgetWoodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: $73,177 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAvenir Health Inc: $66,258 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNortheastern University: $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPopulation Association of America Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMigration Policy Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Population Reference Bureau Inc with peer funders

About Population Reference Bureau Inc

How much does Population Reference Bureau Inc give?
Population Reference Bureau Inc reported 2 itemized grants totaling $1,140,544, out of $1,367,576 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 5 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Population Reference Bureau Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (32%), Science & Tech (30%), Education (29%).
Who are Population Reference Bureau Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc ($8.2M), Developing Radio Partners Inc ($857k), The International Youth Alliance for Family Planning ($845k).
Does Population Reference Bureau Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Population Reference Bureau Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gates Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Population Reference Bureau Inc based?
Population Reference Bureau Inc is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Population Reference Bureau’s filings →

More from the funding graph