Skip to content

· Private foundation

Poore Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$276kHuman Services$92kCommunity Improvement$65kYouth Development$63kAnimals$60kEducation$54kFood & Nutrition$38kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
AGAPE APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE$21,500
MAPS$20,000
ANIMAL PROTECTIVE FOUNDATION$15,000
SARATOGA PRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENTQ$10,818
CONSERNS-UCATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER OF SARATOGA SPRINGS$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,258
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NENY$5,000
SARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
ST PETE FREE CLINIC$5,000
THE PRESCOTT FOUNDATION$2,000
ARC FOUNDATION$2,000
IRONMAN FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 6%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IN
PA
CA
MD
AZ
SC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 95% of Poore Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 5%.

Poore Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 21 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$683k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

62%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    ANIMAL PROTECTIVE FOUNDATION OF SCHENECTADY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +38%
  • PC
    PLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FF
    FUND FOR PUBLIC HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +680%
  • UI
    USONA INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for Public Housing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prescott Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONMAPS: $65,000 · OtherMAPSMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $56,015 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONCONSERNS-UCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $40,000 · OtherCONSERNS-UCATHOLIC CHARITIESAGAPE APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE: $31,500 · OtherAGAPE APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF DELIVERANCECOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $24,102 · OtherBIG BROS OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $22,800 · OtherSARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Other+26 more: $121,532 · Other+26 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $43,653 · HealthAmerican H…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…USONA INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · HealthUSONA INST…+3 more: $3,650 · HealthANIMAL PROTECTIVE FOUNDATION OF SCHENECTADY INC: $59,500 · AnimalsPLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $300 · EducationREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $37,500 · Food & NutritionDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $17,100 · Recreation & SportsFUND FOR PUBLIC HOUSING INC: $10,265 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERS OF SARATOGA INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$530,949Health$69,303Animals$59,500Education$50,300Food & Nutrition$37,500Recreation & Sports$17,100Housing & Shelter$11,265

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL PROTECTIVE FOUNDATION OF SCHENECTADY INC: $59,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $43,653 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $37,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $17,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA CENTER FOR THE FAMILY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS CENTER OF SARATOGA SPRINGS INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFUND FOR PUBLIC HOUSING INC: $10,265 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION HALL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUSONA INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADNOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,750 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,122 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESCOTT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBALLER DREAM FOUNDATION: $1,450 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERS OF SARATOGA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTIVE FOUNDATION OF SCHENECTADY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA CENTER FOR THE FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER OF SARATOGA SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR PUBLIC HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA SPRINGS UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION HALL ↗
  • Who funds USONA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds RADNOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PRESCOTT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Saratoga Casino Hotel Foundation Inc · The Adirondack Trust Company Community Fund · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · The Mitzen Foundation Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Poore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Poore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Poore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph