· Public charity
Polish Supplementary School Council of America Inc
To foster polish culture and teach polish language.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $298,003 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $358,003 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $170k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POLISH LANGUAGE SCHOOL INC | $29,057 |
| CYRIL AND METHODIUS CHURCH POLISH S | $23,196 |
| JOHN PAUL II POLISH LANGUAGE SCHOOL | $15,493 |
| CHURCH OF ST TERESA OF THE CHILD JE | $14,235 |
| ST MICHAELS POLISH SCHOOL A NJ NON | $13,605 |
| POLISH LEARNING CENTER OGNIWO | $11,760 |
| SZKOBA IM MIKOBAJA KOPERNIKA PRZY | $11,077 |
| YOUNG POLONIA ACADEMY INC | $10,069 |
| JOHN PAUL II POLISH SUPPLEMENTARY S | $9,792 |
| THE ORDER OF ST PAUL THE FIRST HERM | $9,523 |
| ST MAXIMILIAN MARIA KOLBE POLISH S | $8,949 |
| HARTFORD POLISH SATURDAY SCHOOL IN | $8,875 |
| ST FAUSTYNA POLISH SUPPLEMENTARY SC | $8,578 |
| HENRYK SIENKIEWICZ EDUCATIONAL SOCI | $8,062 |
| EDUCATIONAL POLISH CORPORATION | $7,917 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educational purposes through teaching polish language and culture to children
Educational
Educational
Education of polish language and culture
Promoting and teaching of polish and english languages
Educational
Teaching children polish language and culture
Education, Polish Language and Culture
Cultivate and teach polish language, literature, culture and traditions.
Teach children the language and history of poland
To teach polish language , history, geography, culture
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Educational Polish Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Webster Bank Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POLISH LANGUAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds John Paul II Polish Language School ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAELS POLISH SCHOOL NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds POLISH LEARNING CENTER OGNIWO INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds YOUNG POLONIA ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds John Paul II Polish Supplementary School Of Maspeth Inc ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD POLISH SATURDAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds St Faustyna Polish Supplementary School Inc ↗
- Who funds HENRYK SIENKIEWICZ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL POLISH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JOHN PAUL II POLISH SCHOOL OF THE POCONOS INC ↗
- Who funds STAMFORD POLISH SATURDAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN PAUL II POLISH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Polish Supplementary School-Polish Falcon Nest 946 ↗
- Who funds POLISH EDUCATIONAL-CULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF GARFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds Webster Bank Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds ZBIGNIEW HERBERT POLISH SUPPLEMENTARY SCHOOL OF LI INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds SZKOLA JEZYKA POLSKIEGO IM SW JANA KANTEGO ↗
- Who funds AKADEMIA JANA PAWLA II - POLISH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Polish Supplementary School Council of America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Polish Supplementary School Council of America Inc?
Find your warmest path to Polish Supplementary School Council of America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.