Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Illinois · Public charity

Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago

Promotion of the interest of veterans of the polish army in the united states. To keep alive memories of veterans who served during both world wars and military operations.

$86k
Granted FY2022
4
Itemized grants FY2022
4
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$65k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$20,000
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$171k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Polish Museum of America$20,00012%
Polish Scouting Organization of Ill$20,0001n/a
Polish American Congress Charitable Foundation$15,00012%
Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciol Ulanow$10,3801n/a

Compare Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago with peer funders

About Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago

How much does Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago give?
Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago reported 4 itemized grants totaling $65,380, out of $86,380 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2022, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (31%), Youth Development (31%), International (23%).
Who are Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: Polish Museum of America ($20k), Polish Scouting Organization of Ill ($20k), Polish American Congress Charitable Foundation ($15k).
Where is Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago based?
Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Polish Army Veterans Association of America Inc Post 90 Chicago’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home