Skip to content

· Private foundation

Po Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$146kInternational$145kEducation$129kHuman Services$89kReligion$71kArts & Culture$39kAnimals$36kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Assistenance Leaue of South Bay$20,000
Holy Trinty School$10,000
Mary and Joseph Retreat Center$10,000
Saint Margaret Mary School$10,000
Habitat for Hummanity$10,000
Bishop Montgomery High School$10,000
Budist Tzu Chi Foundation$10,000
American Red Cross$5,000
El Camino College$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
The Leukemia Lymphoma Society$5,000
Doctors without Borders$5,000
Mercy Ships$5,000
Unicef$2,000
Smile Train$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IN
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 39 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
10

Total granted

$702k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-15%

Still filing today

51%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Mercy Ships International
    7× · 2017–2023 · $39k · revenue +251%
  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +73%
  • AL
    Assistance League of San Pedro-South Bay
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • HT
    Holy Trinity Church Music Develop
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
9
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
10
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Primate Protection League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY SCHOOLAssistenance Leaue of South Bay: $63,000 · OtherAssistenance Leaue of South BayIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAssistance League of San Pedro-South Bay: $30,000 · OtherAssistance League of San Pedro-South BayLittle Sisters of the Poor: $27,500 · OtherLittle Sisters of the PoorHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $24,000 · OtherBISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL: $23,000 · OtherHoly Trinity Church: $20,000 · OtherMary and Joseph Retreat Center: $20,000 · OtherEl Camino College: $20,000 · OtherHoly Trinty Church Music Develop: $20,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $19,500 · Other+21 more: $146,500 · Other+21 moreMercy Ships International: $38,500 · InternationalMercy Ships I…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $11,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDI…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $9,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FO…+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $45,000 · ReligionSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $21,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $9,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $33,000 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $2,000 · EnvironmentMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$513,500International$93,500Religion$45,000Health$44,000Animals$33,000Human Services$15,000Environment$15,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $38,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $33,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAssistance League of San Pedro-South Bay: $30,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $24,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $19,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of San Pedro-South Bay ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Po Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Po Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Po’s filings →

More from the funding graph